8 found
  1.  68
    The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.Daniel M. Bartels & David A. Pizarro - 2011 - Cognition 121 (1):154-161.
  2.  98
    Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.Daniel M. Bartels - 2008 - Cognition 108 (2):381-417.
    Three studies test eight hypotheses about (1) how judgment differs between people who ascribe greater vs. less moral relevance to choices, (2) how moral judgment is subject to task constraints that shift evaluative focus (to moral rules vs. to consequences), and (3) how differences in the propensity to rely on intuitive reactions affect judgment. In Study 1, judgments were affected by rated agreement with moral rules proscribing harm, whether the dilemma under consideration made moral rules versus consequences of choice salient, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  3.  99
    Are Artworks More Like People Than Artifacts? Individual Concepts and Their Extensions.George E. Newman, Daniel M. Bartels & Rosanna K. Smith - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (4):647-662.
    This paper examines people's reasoning about identity continuity and its relation to previous research on how people value one-of-a-kind artifacts, such as artwork. We propose that judgments about the continuity of artworks are related to judgments about the continuity of individual persons because art objects are seen as physical extensions of their creators. We report a reanalysis of previous data and the results of two new empirical studies that test this hypothesis. The first study demonstrates that the mere categorization of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  4.  71
    Selfless giving.Daniel M. Bartels, Trevor Kvaran & Shaun Nichols - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):392-403.
  5.  20
    Are future selves treated like others? Comparing determinants and levels of intrapersonal and interpersonal allocations.Sarah Molouki & Daniel M. Bartels - 2020 - Cognition 196 (C):104150.
  6.  26
    Connecting cognition and consumer choice.Daniel M. Bartels & Eric J. Johnson - 2015 - Cognition 135:47-51.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  68
    Caring about framing effects.Amber N. Bloomfield, Josh A. Sager, Daniel M. Bartels & Douglas L. Medin - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (2):123-138.
    We explored the relationship between qualities of victims in hypothetical scenarios and the appearance of framing effects. In past studies, participants’ feelings about the victims have been demonstrated to affect whether framing effects appear, but this relationship has not been directly examined. In the present study, we examined the relationship between caring about the people at risk, the perceived interdependence of the people at risk, and frame. Scenarios were presented that differed in the degree to which participants could be expected (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  29
    Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity.Samuel B. Day & Daniel M. Bartels - 2008 - Cognition 106 (3):1504-1513.