4 found
  1. Behavioral game theory: Plausible formal models that predict accurately.Colin F. Camerer - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):157-158.
    Many weaknesses of game theory are cured by new models that embody simple cognitive principles, while maintaining the formalism and generality that makes game theory useful. Social preference models can generate team reasoning by combining reciprocation and correlated equilibrium. Models of limited iterated thinking explain data better than equilibrium models do; and they self-repair problems of implausibility and multiplicity of equilibria.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  2. The potential of neuroeconomics.Colin F. Camerer - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):369-379.
    The goal of neuroeconomics is a mathematical theory of how the brain implements decisions, that is tied to behaviour. This theory is likely to show some decisions for which rational-choice theory is a good approximation, to provide a deeper level of distinction among competing behavioural alternatives, and to provide empirical inspiration for economics to incorporate more nuanced ideas about endogeneity of preferences, individual difference, emotions, endogeneous regulation of states, and so forth. I also address some concerns about rhetoric and practical (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  3.  78
    Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games.Colin F. Camerer - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (5):225-231.
  4.  29
    Experimental, cultural, and neural evidence of deliberate prosociality.Colin F. Camerer - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (3):106-108.