comes from the Greek o o ( technologia ), which in turn derives from ( technê ), meaning ‘art’ or ‘technique’, and o ( logos ). Modern technology has reached its present advanced level thanks to the pursuit of ever greater efficiency. In other words, technology has achieved its present level of development by changing from the quest for techniques grounded in o to a form of engineering that is devoid of o and merely pursues efficiency. We must not overlook (...) the great danger in this sort of technology. Technology advancing radically and transformed into engineering devoid of o cannot perceive its raison d’être and the meaning of its tasks from the perspective of the overall quest for knowledge; as a result, the process of technological development hurtles ahead blindly without a normal sense of balance. The effects on human society are immense. At this juncture we must return to the spirit of Greek o o and urgently rebuild a technology grounded in awareness of o as the wellspring of all knowledge. This is a task that we must address without delay in order to avoid the destruction of humankind. Key Words: applied ethics • logos • technologia • wellspring of technology. (shrink)

この世界とは何か、を説明しようとする時、意識するとしないとにかかわらず、思い浮かべ、考えざるを得ない問いがある。それは、「人間とは何か」「国家とは何か」「国際関係とは何か」という3つの問いである。これ らの問いが織りなす「世界のできあがり方」の構造を、本書は「自我・国家・国際関係」と呼ぶ。現在も世界の人々を拘束し続ける、この認識論的機制の近代日本における形成過程を、明治末から昭和前半期に活躍した哲学 史家、朝永三十郎の「文脈設定者」としての思想的苦闘から描き出す。「国際関係とは何か」という、国際関係研究の根源への問いを問うには、世界国家の可能性を封じ込めた瞬間を把捉しなければならない。カントの『永 遠平和のために』の単なる解説書とされてきた朝永の『カントの平和論』における、「国際」と「国家」の矛盾、という議論に、その瞬間は埋蔵されていたのである。学問領域を横断し、理論と歴史、思想と実証を交錯させ て根源への問いへ挑み、21世紀の世界の見方、考え方を広く問いかける。.

Modeling legal argumentation is one of the most important research in AI and Law, and a lot of models have been proposed. However, most research has not treated value judgement and debate. In this paper, we introduce a legal reasoning model which covers various aspects of legalreasoning such as making argument, selecting argument and debate.Furthermore, we present how criminal law is described and reasoned inthis model.

1. Yu Hyŏng-wŏn ŭi ppuri wa Pan'gyehak ŭl nonhada -- 1.1. Pan'gye Yu Hyŏng-wŏn kagye punsŏk -- 1.2. Chiyŏkhak ŭrosŏ Pan'gyehak yŏn'gu -- 2. Pan'gye Sŏnsaeng palchach'wi rŭl ch'aja kada -- 2.1. Sirhak ŭi mek'a, Puan Uban-dong -- 2.2. Pan'gye Sŏnsaeng i namgin palchach'wi -- 2.3. Puan chiyŏk Yugyo munhwa yusan ŭi hyŏnhwang kwa kwaje -- 3. Pan'gye Sŏnsaeng ŭl kirida -- 3.1. Puan Tongnim Sŏwŏn ŭi kŏllip kwa pyŏnch'ŏn e taehan yŏn'gu -- 3.2. Tŏkch'on Yang Tŭk-chung ŭi kagye wa (...) ch'usung e kwanhan yŏn'gu -- 3.3. Hong Kye-hŭi Kyŏngseron ŭi chaejijŏk kiban. (shrink)