One of the central issues in cognitive science is the nature of human representations. We argue that symbolic representations are essential for capturing human cognitive capabilities. We start by examining some common misconceptions found in discussions of representations and models. Next we examine evidence that symbolic representations are essential for capturing human cognitive capabilities, drawing on the analogy literature. Then we examine fundamental limitations of feature vectors and other distributed representations that, despite their recent successes on various practical problems, suggest (...) that they are insufficient to capture many aspects of human cognition. After that, we describe the implications for cognitive architecture of our view that analogy is central, and we speculate on roles for hybrid approaches. We close with an analogy that might help bridge the gap. (shrink)

ObjectiveThe impact of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program on psychological outcomes and quality of life in lung cancer patients remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the MBSR program on psychological states and QoL in lung cancer patients.MethodsEligible studies published before November 2021 were systematically searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. The risk of bias in eligible studies was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Psychological variables and QoL were evaluated (...) as outcomes. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to grade the levels of evidence. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and STATA 14.0.ResultsA total of 17 studies involving 1,680 patients were included for meta-analysis eventually. MBSR program significantly relieved cancer-related fatigue and negative psychological states, enhanced positive psychological states, and improved quality of sleep. Evidence on MBSR programs' overall treatment effect for QoL revealed a trend toward statistical significance.ConclusionBased on our findings, the MBSR program shows positive effects on psychological states in lung cancer patients. This approach should be recommended as a part of the rehabilitation program for lung cancer patients.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-mwvbq-v1, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MWVBQ. (shrink)

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. “Bioethics: Cross-Cultural Explorations”一文主要是譚傑志(Joseph Tham)教授對他負責的關於推動跨文化對話的聯合國教科文組織專案的系統性報吿。文章詳盡闡述了該專案十餘年來宗教學術對話工作的模式、性質與目標，也對諸如普遍主義與多元主義、科學與信仰等經典問題在該項工作 中的重現提出了見解，並特別強調了宗教在增加生命倫理學討論的厚度方面的積極作用。(Tham 2022) (撮要取自內文首段) For religion to remain a guiding force in bioethics, it is important to maintain the sustainability of cross-cultural dialogue. In my opinion, these dialogues may encounter two difficulties. First, the high level of work that is required to create dialogues, combined with the modern phenomenon of “disenchantment,” make it difficult to find suitable successors. Second, if religious bioethics only considers pioneering positions of the (...) past without considering dynamic changes in social beliefs, it may not be able to carve out a place in the future of bioethics. (shrink)

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. “Bioethics: Cross-Cultural Explorations”一文主要是譚傑志(Joseph Tham)教授對他負責的關於推動跨文化對話的聯合國教科文組織專案的系統性報吿。文章詳盡闡述了該專案十餘年來宗教學術對話工作的模式、性質與目標，也對諸如普遍主義與多元主義、科學與信仰等經典問題在該項工作 中的重現提出了見解，並特別強調了宗教在增加生命倫理學討論的厚度方面的積極作用。(Tham 2022) (撮要取自內文首段) For religion to remain a guiding force in bioethics, it is important to maintain the sustainability of cross-cultural dialogue. In my opinion, these dialogues may encounter two difficulties. First, the high level of work that is required to create dialogues, combined with the modern phenomenon of “disenchantment,” make it difficult to find suitable successors. Second, if religious bioethics only considers pioneering positions of the (...) past without considering dynamic changes in social beliefs, it may not be able to carve out a place in the future of bioethics. (shrink)