8 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Carolyn Brighouse [8]Carolyn Jane Brighouse [1]
  1. Spacetime and Holes.Carolyn Brighouse - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:117 - 125.
    John Earman and John Norton have argued that substantivalism leads to a radical form of indeterminism within local spacetime theories. I compare their argument to more traditional arguments typical in the Relationist/Substantivalist dispute and show that they all fail for the same reason. All these arguments ascribe to the substantivalist a particular way of talking about possibility. I argue that the substantivalist is not committed to the modal claims required for the arguments to have any force, and show that this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  2. Determinism and Modality.Carolyn Brighouse - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):465-481.
    The hole argument contends that a substantivalist has to view General Relativity as an indeterministic theory. A recent form of substantivalist reply to the hole argument has urged the substantivalist to identify qualitatively isomorphic possible worlds. Gordon Belot has argued that this form of substantivalism is unable to capture other genuine violations of determinism. This paper argues that Belot's alleged examples of indeterminism should not be seen as a violation of a form of determinism that physicists are interested in. What (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  3.  34
    Confessions of a (Cheap) Sophisticated Substantivalist.Carolyn Brighouse - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (4):348-359.
    I illustrate a challenge to a view that is a response to the Hole Argument. The view, sophisticated substantivalism, has been claimed to be the received view. While sophisticated substantivalism has many defenders, there is a fundamental tension in the view that has not received the attention it deserves. Anyone who defends or endorses sophisticated substantivalism, should acknowledge this challenge, and should either show why it is not serious or explain how to respond to it.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4. Incongruent Counterparts and Modal Relationism.Carolyn Brighouse - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):53 – 68.
    Kant's argument from incongruent counterparts for substantival space is examined; it is concluded that the argument has no force against a relationist. The argument does suggest that a relationist cannot give an account of enantiomorphism, incongruent counterparts and orientability. The prospects for a relationist account of these notions are assessed, and it is found that they are good provided the relationist is some kind of modal relationist. An illustration and interpretation of these modal commitments is given.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  5.  33
    Frank Arntzenius: Space, Time, and Stuff.Carolyn Brighouse - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (7):358-362.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  39
    Geometric Possibility- an Argument From Dimension.Carolyn Brighouse - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):31-54.
    One cannot expect an exact answer to the question “What are the possible structures of space?”, but rough answers to it impact central debates within philosophy of space and time. Recently Gordon Belot has suggested that a rough answer takes the class of metric spaces to represent the possible structures of space. This answer has intuitive appeal, but I argue, focusing on topological characterizations of dimension, examples of prima facie space-like mathematical spaces that have pathological dimension properties, and endorsing a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  27
    New Foundations for Physical Geometry, by Tim Maudlin.Carolyn Brighouse - 2015 - Mind 124 (496):1332-1338.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  35
    How Should We Understand Relativistic Persistence?: Yuri Balashov: Persistence and Relativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 233pp, $55 HB.Carolyn Brighouse - 2012 - Metascience 21 (1):87-90.
    How should we understand relativistic persistence? Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9543-3 Authors Carolyn Brighouse, Department of Philosophy, Occidental College, 1600 Campus Road, Los Angeles, CA 90041, USA Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark