18 found
Bruce Caldwell [22]Bruce J. Caldwell [8]
  1.  2
    Beyond Positivism.Bruce Caldwell - 2014 - Routledge.
    Since its publication in 1982, _Beyond Positivism _has become established as one of the definitive statements on economic methodology. The book’s rejection of positivism and its advocacy of pluralism were to have a profound influence in the flowering of work methodology that has taken place in economics in the decade since its publication. This edition contains a new preface outlining the major developments in the area since the book’s first appearance. The book provides the first comprehensive treatment of twentieth century (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  2.  52
    A Skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison Versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and Methodology.Bruce Caldwell - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):315-324.
    The paper is a reminiscence of T.W. Hutchison by way of a retrospective view of our debate over the relationship between the ideas of Karl Popper, F. A. Hayek, and Ludwig von Mises on methodology. Our dispute was part of a larger debate over the relevance of Popper's thought for economic methodology. Its place within the larger debate is also explored.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  80
    Hayek's Scientific Subjectivism.Bruce Caldwell - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (2):305.
  4.  49
    Some Problems with Falsificationism in Economics.Bruce J. Caldwell - 1984 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (4):489-495.
  5.  13
    14 Hayek and Cultural Evolution.Bruce Caldwell - 2002 - In Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 285.
  6.  15
    Hayek, Social Science, and Politics: Reply to Hill and Friedman.Bruce Caldwell - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):377-390.
    Hayek's case for the limits of economic agents? knowledge does not, as Greg Hill seems to suggest, imply that government should be in the business of engaging in countercyclical fiscal policy or paternalistic corrections of people's pursuit of ?imaginary goods.? In the latter case, markets have corrective learning mechanisms for consumer mistakes. In the former, public?choice and public?ignorance problems plague government efforts to correct the business cycle. The problem of public ignorance is, in turn, Jeffrey Friedman's topic, but he is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  6
    Hayek, Logic, and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Bruce Caldwell & Julian Reiss - 2006 - Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28 (3):359-370.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  23
    Recovering Popper: For the Left?Bruce Caldwell - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):49-68.
    In his biography of Karl Popper, Malachi Hacohen brilliantly reconstructs the development of Popper's ideas through 1946, correcting many errors regarding the sequence of their emergence. In addition he recreates Popper's Vienna and provides insights into Popper's complex personality. A larger goal of Hacohen's narrative is to show the relevance of Popper's philosophical and political thought for the left. Unfortunately this leads him to neglect and distort certain aspects of the story he tells, particularly when it comes to the relationship (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  17
    Ludwig M. Lachmann: A Reminiscence.Bruce J. Caldwell - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (1):139-144.
  10.  26
    Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach, Sheila Dow, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1985, Xi, 268 Pages.What is Political Economy? David Whynes, Editor, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1984, Ix, 243 Pages.Economics in Disarray, Peter Wiles and Guy Routh, Editors, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1984, Vii, 355 Pages. [REVIEW]Bruce J. Caldwell - 1986 - Economics and Philosophy 2 (1):141.
  11.  43
    Acknowledgment of External Reviewers for 2002.Joel Andreas, Richard Berk, Fred Block, Davis John Bowen, Ann E. Bowler, Lisa Brush, Bruce J. Caldwell, Greensboro Bruce G. Carruthers, Thomas Gold & Berkeley Mark Granovetter - 2003 - Theory and Society 32 (1):151-152.
  12.  6
    Economic Methodology: A Bibliography with References to Works in the Philosophy of Science, 1860-1988. Deborah A. Redman. [REVIEW]Bruce J. Caldwell - 1991 - Isis 82 (2):422-422.
  13.  48
    George Soros: Hayekian?Bruce Caldwell - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):350-356.
    This paper examines many similarities in the methodological and ontological views of George Soros and Friedrich Hayek.
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
  14.  10
    Hayek and Popper: On Rationality, Economism, and Democracy.Bruce Caldwell - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):227-234.
  15. International Network for Economic Method.Bruce Caldwell, Hon Secretaryflreasurer & Roger Backhouse - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (1):151-153.
  16. Rules as Adaptive (but Not Always Conscious) Choices. A Review of Viktor J. Vanberg's Rules and Choice in Economics.Bruce Caldwell - 1998 - Journal of Economic Methodology 5:299-303.
  17.  5
    Review of Robust Political Economy: Classical Liberalism and the Future of Public Policy. [REVIEW]Bruce Caldwell - 2011 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 17 (1).
  18.  7
    Wieser, Hayek and Equilibrium Theory.Bruce J. Caldwell - 2002 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 12 (1).
    The paper challenges Joseph Salerno’s recent revisionist account in “The Place of Human Action in the Development of Economic Thought” of the relationship between Friedrich von Wieser and F.A. Hayek and of their views on equilibrium theory. The paper argues, contra Salerno, that Wieser was not a proponent of general equilibrium theory, so could not have influenced Hayek in the manner Salerno suggests; that there was not a concerted effort by Schumpeter, Wieser, Mayer, and Hayek to advocate general equilibrium theory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation