4 found
Order:
  1.  28
    Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating.Ben M. Tappin, Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand - 2020 - Cognition 204 (C):104375.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2.  63
    Biased belief in the Bayesian brain: A deeper look at the evidence.Ben M. Tappin & Stephen Gadsby - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 68 (C):107-114.
    A recent critique of hierarchical Bayesian models of delusion argues that, contrary to a key assumption of these models, belief formation in the healthy (i.e., neurotypical) mind is manifestly non-Bayesian. Here we provide a deeper examination of the empirical evidence underlying this critique. We argue that this evidence does not convincingly refute the assumption that belief formation in the neurotypical mind approximates Bayesian inference. Our argument rests on two key points. First, evidence that purports to reveal the most damning violation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  3.  20
    Choosing the right level of analysis: Stereotypes shape social reality via collective action.Ben M. Tappin, Ryan T. McKay & Dominic Abrams - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40:e13.
    In his 2012 book Jussim argues that the self-fulfilling prophecy and expectancy effects of descriptive stereotypes are not potent shapers of social reality. However, his conclusion that descriptive stereotypesper sedo not shape social reality is premature and overly reductionist. We review evidence that suggests descriptive stereotypes do have a substantial influence on social reality, by virtue of their influence on collective action.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  29
    Do the folk actually hold folk-economic beliefs?Ben M. Tappin, Robert Ross & Ryan T. McKay - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    Boyer & Petersen argue that folk-economic beliefs are widespread – shaped by evolved cognitive systems – and they offer exemplar beliefs to illustrate their thesis. In this commentary, we highlight evidence of substantial variation in one of these exemplars: beliefs about immigration. Contra claims by B&P, we argue that the balance of this evidence suggests the “folk” may actually holdpositivebeliefs about the economic impact of immigration.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark