Original research on Wittgenstein's period in Cambridge, from 1929; his time with Francis Skinner; his visit to Russia, and World War 2, utlizing some uninvestigated manuscripts dictated by Wittgenstein, including a critique of Kreisal's misuse of Wittgenstein's writing on mathematical philosophy.

In the decade between Elizabeth Anscombe’s arrival in Cambridge in 1942 and Wittgenstein’s death in 1951 she became in turn a student, a friend, and then a chosen translator of his work. His choice of her as translator and literary heir speaks for itself, but it is not widely appreciated that the position she came to occupy contrasted with aspects of his Cambridge life prior to her taking up a research studentship at Newnham College. Anscombe came to be a profound (...) and original philosopher. Perhaps Wittgenstein’s engagement with her presupposed an inkling of her qualitative gifts later attested to by Donald Davidson, who estimated her short monograph Intention to be “the most important treatment of action since Aristotle.” It is impressive that while living amid the throes of WWII, giving birth to a large family, often engaging with forces surrounding Wittgenstein, and holding her own with him, she was simultaneously crafting her own philosophical progress. Twenty years after his death she was appointed to the Chair of Philosophy at Cambridge that he had occupied when they first met. (shrink)

Metaphysics and Transcendence takes up this story for the future. Arthur Gibson presents a new metaphysics with a genealogy based on counter-intuition and locates counter-intuition and complexity at the foundations of truth. Having devised fresh concepts on the basis of the new frontiers of science and philosophy, the author presents original explanations of transcendence arguing that just as we need revolutionary and original ways of depicting the physical world, so it is with such topics as God, miracles, the resurrection, the (...) source and identity of consciousness and reason itself. (shrink)

Personal biographical outline of being taught by, and encounters with, Peter Geach.

An original theory of some relations between certain aspects of sampled dead languages, compared to and contrasted with a variery of partially connectible formal languages. This is the context for a new analysis of competing and conflicting scholarly accounts of typical semantic fields in the ancent uses of these languages. Actual textual examples are deployedthroughout this book to embed its proceedings in actual creative narrative. A further layer of engagement is to engage in assessing the status of recent influential interpretations (...) of these texts. (shrink)

Application and new theory of philosophical logic and philosophy of language to dead linguistics ancient Near East languages.