8 found
Order:
  1. Hard Cases: A Procedural Approach. [REVIEW]Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes & Arno R. Lodder - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (2):113-167.
    Much work on legal knowledge systems treats legal reasoning as arguments that lead from a description of the law and the facts of a case, to the legal conclusion for the case. The reasoning steps of the inference engine parallel the logical steps by means of which the legal conclusion is derived from the factual and legal premises. In short, the relation between the input and the output of a legal inference engine is a logical one. The truth of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  2.  55
    Law, Logic, Rhetoric: A Procedural Model of Legal Argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 569--588.
  3.  37
    Book Review: Pamela N. Gray Artificial Legal Intelligence, Darmouth, Aldershot, England, 1997. [REVIEW]Arno R. Lodder - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):231-238.
  4.  77
    Gearbi: Towards an Online Arbitration Environment Based on the Design Principles Simplicity, Awareness, Orientation, and Timeliness. [REVIEW]Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk & Arno R. Lodder - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):297-321.
    Arbitration is a preferred method for the resolution of international business disputes. As of yet, most publications on online arbitration deal with legal issues. In this paper, we present an Online arbitration environment that we believe facilitates the participants in a meaningful way. Our assumption is that an ODR service should be easy to use (convenient), and at the same time provide meaningful support. More specifically we have paid attention to four criteria that we believe are important, viz. simplicity, awareness, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  28
    Thomas F. Gordon, the Pleadings Game – an Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice.Arno R. Lodder - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):255-264.
  6.  18
    Christopher W. Tindale, Acts of Arguing, a Rhetorical Model of Argument.Arno R. Lodder - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
  7.  11
    Preface.Arno R. Lodder & John Zeleznikow - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):189-192.
  8.  3
    Book Review of Gordon (1995). [REVIEW]Arno R. Lodder - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):255-264.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation