7 found
Order:
See also
Anna Yampolskaya
National Research University Higher School of Economics
  1.  8
    Metamorphoses of the Subject: Kandinsky Interpreted by Michel Henry and Henri Maldiney.Anna Yampolskaya - 2018 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 9 (2):157-167.
    In this paper I compare how Michel Henry and Henri Maldiney interpret Kandinsky’s heritage. Henry’s phenomenology is based on a distinction between two main modes of manifestation: the ordinary one, that is, the manifestation of the world, and the “manifestation of life.” For him, Kandinsky’s work provides a paradigmatic example of the second, more original mode of manifestation, which is free from all forms of self-alienation. Henry claims that this living through the work of art is transformative; it is akin (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  24
    The problematization of the “aesthetical experience” in Henri Maldiney’s phenomenology.Anna Yampolskaya - 2018 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 7 (2):414-429.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  22
    ‘Estrangement’ in Aesthetics and Beyond: Russian Formalism and Phenomenological Method.Georgy Chernavin & Anna Yampolskaya - 2019 - Continental Philosophy Review 52 (1):91-113.
    We investigate the parallelism between aesthetic experience and the practice of phenomenology using Viktor Shklovsky’s theory of “estrangement”. In his letter to Hugo von Hofmannsthal, Husserl claims that aesthetic and phenomenological experiences are similar; in the perception of a work of art we change our attitude in order to concentrate on how the things appear to us instead of what they are. A work of art “forces us into” the aesthetic attitude in the same way as the phenomenological epoché drives (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  19
    Book Review: Adonis Frangeskou “Levinas, Kant and the problem of temporality” London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Isbn 978-1-137-59795-3. [REVIEW]Anna Yampolskaya - 2018 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 7 (2):576-585.
    Frangeskou’s point of departure in his juxtaposition of Levinas and Kant is the problem of transcenden- tal schematism but not the tension between autonomy and heteronomy as it is common for most of the published literature. Thus, the middle ground between Levinas and Kant is occupied by Heidegger, but also by Franz Rosenzweig with his “biblical” version of ecstatic temporality. Levinassian diachrony is described by Frangeskou as a new form of ecstatic temporality, different from the interpretations given by Heidegger and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Lévinas en Russie: une philosophie inattendue, dérangeante, incontournable.Anna Yampolskaya - 2008 - Les Cahiers d'Études Lévinassiennes 7.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  4
    On the Frontline of Phenomenological Experience. The Preface to the Translation of the First of “Phenomenological Meditations” by Marc Richir.Sacha Carlson & Anna Yampolskaya - 2020 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (1):275-282.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  2
    Reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s Response.Anna Yampolskaya - 2020 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (1):366-372.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark