11 found
Order:
  1.  25
    Measuring Recollection and Familiarity: Improving the Remember/Know Procedure.Ellen M. Migo, Andrew R. Mayes & Daniela Montaldi - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1435-1455.
    The remember/know procedure is the most widely used method to investigate recollection and familiarity. It uses trial-by-trial reports to determine how much recollection and familiarity contribute to different kinds of recognition. Few other methods provide information about individual memory judgements and no alternative allows such direct indications of recollection and familiarity influences. Here we review how the RK procedure has been and should be used to help resolve theoretical disagreements about the processing and neural bases of components of recognition memory. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  28
    Familiarity, Recollection and Medial Temporal Lobe Function: An Unresolved Issue.Daniela Montaldi & Andrew R. Mayes - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (8):339-340.
  3. Aware and Unaware Memory: Does Unaware Memory Underlie Aware Memory?Andrew R. Mayes - 2001 - In Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormark (eds.), Time and Memory. Oxford University Press.
  4.  15
    How Close is the Functional Interdependence Between Hippocampus and Superior Colliculus?Andrew R. Mayes - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1):126-127.
  5.  16
    What Exactly Do Amnesics Fail to Store Normally?Andrew R. Mayes - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):486-487.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. 25. Memory, Disturbances of Memory and Human Knowledge of Reality and Ourselves.Andrew R. Mayes - 1994 - In E. Critchley (ed.), The Neurological Boundaries of Reality. Farrand. pp. 401.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  16
    Accuracy and Quantity Are Poor Measures of Recall and Recognition.Andrew R. Mayes, Rob van Eijk & Patricia L. Gooding - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):201-202.
    The value of accuracy and quantity as memory measures is assessed. It is argued that accuracy does not measure correspondence because it ignores omissions and correct rejections, quantity is confounded with monitoring in recall, and in recognition, if targets and foils are unequal, both measures, even together, still ignore correct rejections.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Theories of Episodic Memory.Andrew R. Mayes & Neil Roberts - 2002 - In Alan Baddeley, John Aggleton & Martin Conway (eds.), Episodic Memory: New Directions in Research. Oxford University Press.
  9.  10
    The Neuropsychology of Memory.Andrew R. Mayes - 2000 - In G. Berrios & J. Hodges (eds.), Memory Disorders in Psychiatric Practice. Cambridge University Press. pp. 58.
  10.  37
    A New Theoretical Framework for Explicit and Implicit Memory.Andrew R. Mayes, Patricia Gooding & Rob van Eijk - 1997 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 3.
    A framework to explain item-specific implicit and explicit memory is proposed. It explores the mutual implications of four kinds of processing mechanism that are familiar in the literature. The first kind of mechanisms are those related to memory representation which include the kind of storage processes that subserve the maintenance of different types of information in memory. It is argued that there is very little evidence to suggest that fact and event memory require the postulation of algorithmically distinct kinds of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  3
    Selective Memory Disorders.Andrew R. Mayes - 2000 - In Endel Tulving (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford University Press. pp. 427--440.