31 found
Order:
See also
Andreas Follesdal
University of Oslo
  1.  68
    Real World Justice: Grounds, Principles, Human Rights, and Social Institutions.Andreas Follesdal & Thomas Pogge (eds.) - 2005 - Springer.
    It helps ordinary citizens evaluate their options and their responsibility for global institutional factors, and it challenges social scientists to address the causes of poverty and hunger that act across borders.The present volume ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  58
    Survey Article: Subsidiarity.Andreas Follesdal - 1998 - Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2):190-218.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  3.  60
    The distributive justice of a global basic structure: A category mistake?Andreas Follesdal - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):46-65.
    The present article explores ‘anti-cosmopolitan’ arguments that shared institutions above the state, such as there are, are not of a kind that support or give rise to distributive claims beyond securing minimum needs. The upshot is to rebut certain of these ‘anti-cosmopolitan’ arguments. Section 1 asks under which conditions institutions are subject to distributive justice norms. That is, which sound reasons support claims to a relative share of the benefits of institutions that exist and apply to individuals? Such norms may (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  4.  14
    Survey Article: The Legitimacy of International Courts.Andreas Follesdal - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4):476-499.
    Journal of Political Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  12
    Tracking justice democratically.Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):324-339.
    Is international judicial human rights review anti-democratic and therefore illegitimate, and objectionably epistocratic to boot? Or is such review compatible with—and even a recommended component of—an epistemic account of democracy? This article defends the latter position, laying out the case for the legitimacy, possibly democratic legitimacy of such judicial review of democratically enacted legislation and policy-making. The article first offers a brief conceptual sketch of the kind of epistemic democracy and the kind of international human rights courts of concern—in particular (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6.  12
    Tracking justice democratically.Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):324-339.
    Is international judicial human rights review anti-democratic and therefore illegitimate, and objectionably epistocratic to boot? Or is such review compatible with—and even a recommended component of—an epistemic account of democracy? This article defends the latter position, laying out the case for the legitimacy, possibly democratic legitimacy of such judicial review of democratically enacted legislation and policy-making. The article first offers a brief conceptual sketch of the kind of epistemic democracy and the kind of international human rights courts of concern—in particular (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  24
    Union Citizenship: Unpacking the Beast of Burden.Andreas Follesdal - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (3):313-343.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  8.  49
    Subsidiarity, Democracy, and Human Rights in the Constitutional Treaty of Europe.Andreas Follesdal - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (1):61-80.
  9. The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in the EU and Canada.Andreas Follesdal & Victor M. Muñiz Fraticelli - 2015 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 10 (2):89-106.
    Andreas Follesdal,Victor Muñiz Fraticelli | : A Principle of Subsidiarity regulates the allocation and/or use of authority within a political order where authority is dispersed between a centre and various sub-units. Section 1 sketches the role of such principle of subsidiarity in the EU, and some of its significance in Canada. Section 2 presents some conceptions of subsidiarity that indicate the range of alternatives. Section 3 considers some areas where such conceptions might add value to constitutional and political deliberations in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  14
    Getting to justice?Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2):231-242.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  3
    Kantian Theory and Human Rights.Andreas Follesdal & Reidar Maliks - 2013 - Routledge.
    "The growing interest in human rights has recently brought the question of their philosophical foundation to the foreground. Theorists of human rights often assume that their ideal can be traced to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and his view of humans as ends in themselves. Yet, few have attempted to explore exactly how human rights should be understood in a Kantian framework. The scholars in this have gathered to fill this gap. Divided in three parts, firstly the Kantian notion of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  2
    In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review.Andreas Follesdal - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.
    Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  73
    Equality of Education and Citizenship: Challenges of European Integration.Andreas Follesdal - 2007 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (5):335-354.
    What kind of equality among Europeans does equal citizenship require, especially regarding education? In particular, is there good reason to insist of equality of education among Europeans—and if so, equality of what? To what extent should the same knowledge base and citizenship norms be taught across state borders and religious and other normative divides? At least three philosophical issues merit attention: The requirements of multiple democratic citizenships beyond the nation state; how to respect diversity while securing such equality and inculcating (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Theories of human rights : institutional or orthodox : why it matters.Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - In Reidar Maliks & Johan Karlsson Schaffer (eds.), Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. The Significance of State Borders for International Distributive Justice.Andreas Follesdal - 1991 - Dissertation, Harvard University
    How should the global set of social institutions distribute income and wealth among members of different states? I present a Theory of Global Justice which supports the Bounded Significance of State Borders: The states system must satisfy the Determinate Human Needs of all, and the distribution within each state must satisfy Rawls' Difference Principle. However, justice does not require a Global Difference Principle: income and wealth need not be distributed so as to maximize the income and wealth of the globally (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  56
    Constructing a European Civic Society – Vaccination for Trust in a Fair, Multi-Level Europe.Andreas Follesdal - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (4):303-324.
  17.  3
    In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review.Andreas Follesdal - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.
    Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  33
    Multiple citizenship: normative ideals and institutional challenges.Eva Erman & Andreas Follesdal - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):279-302.
    Institutional suggestions for how to rethink democracy in response to changing state responsibilities and capabilities have been numerous and often mutually incompatible. This suggests that conceptual unclarity still reigns concerning how the normative ideal of democracy as collective self-determination, i.e. ?rule by the people?, might best be brought to bear in a transnational and global context. The aim in this paper is twofold. First, it analyses some consequences of the tendency to smudge the distinction between democratic theory and moral theories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  37
    The legitimacy of international human rights review: The case of the european court of human rights.Andreas Follesdal - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):595-607.
  20.  1
    In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review.Andreas Follesdal - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.
    Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  11
    The Legitimacy Deficits of the Human Rights Judiciary: Elements and Implications of a Normative Theory.Andreas Follesdal - 2013 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14 (2):339-360.
    The Article addresses some of the disagreement concerning the legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary. It lays out some aspects of a theory of legitimacy for the international human rights judiciary that seem relevant to addressing two challenges: First, it is difficult to justify the human rights judiciary by appeal to standard accounts of why states agree to subject themselves to treaties. What is the problem the international human rights judiciary is meant to help solve? Second, the human rights (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  16
    Global Ethics and Respect for Culture.Andreas Follesdal - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 15:3-23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  7
    Add international courts to The Idea of Human Rights_ and stir … on Beitz’ _The Idea of Human Rights after 10 years.Andreas Follesdal - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (1):66-86.
    These reflections elaborates the theory of The Idea of Human Rights by addressing a topic that theory attempts to bracket: international and regional judicialization in the form of international courts and tribunals. Using the method of reflective equilibrium, the article argues that this exclusion is inconsistent. Including these international courts and tribunals (‘ICs’) prompts several changes to the original theory, and opens new research questions. The original theory is on the one hand too narrow regarding both the objectives and tools (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  13
    Machiavelli at 500: From Cynic to Vigilant Supporter of International Law.Andreas Follesdal - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (2):242-251.
    Machiavelli's 500-year-old treatise The Prince outlined the central features of the realist tradition in international relations. His premises led him to question the likelihood of efficacious and stable international law and international courts, a skepticism that has present-day proponents. Machiavelli's reluctance was due to a combination of features of human nature and a focus on anarchic features of the relations among states. This article challenges these assumptions and implications: Other interpretations of human nature are closer to Machiavelli's text, and current (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  15
    Why Deliberative Democracy?Andreas Follesdal - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (1):125-127.
  26.  11
    Can There Be a Just Zionism? Does Anyone Care? On Chaim Ganz, A Just Zionism.Andreas Follesdal - 2011 - Ethical Perspectives 18 (4):625-632.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  18
    Introduction: How to bring normative requirements to bear on institutions beyond the state.Andreas Follesdal - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):461-465.
  28.  6
    Global Ethics and Respect for Culture.Andreas Follesdal - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 15:3-23.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  21
    Exit, choice, and loyalty: Religious liberty versus gender equality.Andreas Follesdal - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):407–420.
  30.  17
    Union citizenship: Conceptions, conditions and preconditions. [REVIEW]Andreas Follesdal - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (3):233-237.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  1
    In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review.Andreas Follesdal - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.
    Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark