6 found
Order:
  1.  31
    A Plea for Complex Categories in Ontologies.Alexandra Arapinis & Laure Vieu - 2015 - Applied Ontology 10 (3-4):285-296.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2.  17
    Referring to Institutional Entities: Semantic and Ontological Perspectives.Alexandra Arapinis - 2013 - Applied Ontology 8 (1):31-57.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  56
    Whole-for-Part Metonymy, Classification, and Grounding.Alexandra Arapinis - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (1):1-29.
    Since the early 1980s, metonymy has progressively gained central stage in linguistic investigations. The advent of cognitive linguistics marked a new turn in the study of this trope conceived, not as a deviation from semantic conventions, but as a phenomenon rooted in non-language-specific mechanisms of conceptualization of the world. Acknowledging that metonymy is ultimately cognitive in nature, this paper proposes to consider metonymy from its multiple levels of manifestation, integrating cognitive, pragmatic, semantic, but also ontological angles of approach. Taking whole-for-part (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Whole-for-Part Metonymy as Classification Exploiting Functional Integrity.Alexandra Arapinis - forthcoming - Linguistics and Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Anchoring the Institutional in the Material. Searle's Constitutive Rule Revisited.Alexandra Arapinis - forthcoming - European Journal of Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  10
    The Intensionality Behind Legal Concepts and Their Extensional Boundaries: Between Conventionalism and Interpretivism.Alexandra Arapinis & Angela Condello - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (4):439-459.
    This article constitutes an attempt to reexamine a crucial issue of legal theory from the perspective of philosophy of language and of social ontology: by analyzing a jurisprudential case recently decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, we explain how Searle's account on rules in The Construction of Social Reality constitutes an important starting point for the clarification of the old jurisprudential debate between conventionalism and interpretivism. In a nutshell, we show that Searle's framework, while strictly conventionalist, makes it possible to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark