Order:
  1.  83
    Having Your Day in Robot Court.Benjamin Chen, Alexander Stremitzer & Kevin Tobia - 2023 - Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 36.
    Should machines be judges? Some say no, arguing that citizens would see robot-led legal proceedings as procedurally unfair because “having your day in court” is having another human adjudicate your claims. Prior research established that people obey the law in part because they see it as procedurally just. The introduction of artificially intelligent (AI) judges could therefore undermine sentiments of justice and legal compliance if citizens intuitively take machine-adjudicated proceedings to be less fair than the human-adjudicated status quo. Two original (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  18
    When Does Physician Use of AI Increase Liability?Kevin Tobia, Aileen Nielsen & Alexander Stremitzer - 2021 - Journal of Nuclear Medicine 62.
    An increasing number of automated and artificially intelligent (AI) systems make medical treatment recommendations, including “personalized” recommendations, which can deviate from standard care. Legal scholars argue that following such nonstandard treatment recommendations will increase liability in medical malpractice, undermining the use of potentially beneficial medical AI. However, such liability depends in part on lay judgments by jurors: When physicians use AI systems, in which circumstances would jurors hold physicians liable? To determine potential jurors’ judgments of liability, we conducted an online (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Moral Intuitions of Promise Keeping.Florian Ederer & Alexander Stremitzer - 2019 - Principia 65 (Tom 65):5-33.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark