This paper analyses the concept of justice that John Stuart Mill exposes in one of his main works: The Utilitarianism. The article states that this notion of justice, paradoxically to Mill's spirit, can set up the foundations for a totalitarian society, instead of the liberal order that he promotes in his other main work, On liberty.

In this book Harris intends to construct an agent-centered conception of morality grounded on a naturalistic understanding of practical reason. In order to achieve this goal, he contrasts his Aristotelian revisionist perspective with the traditional and internalist Kantian proposals, focusing on two specific matters: the opposition between agent-centered and agent-neutral norms, and the newer and very interesting discussion of symmetrical versus asymmetrical regulative norms. The first topic will be especially relevant for the rejection of traditional Kantianism, while the second will (...) be the main argument against Kantian internalism. The author defends the thesis that some nouns have priority in some contexts and not in others against the context-insensibility of Kantian theories. In particular, giving a fair account of them and plenty of detailed argument to refute some of their aspects, he discusses Barbara Herman’s, Marcia Baron’s, Nancy Sherman’s, David Cummiskey’s, Christine Kosgaard’s, and John Rawls’s proposals. (shrink)

This study postulates that Hobbes’s moral and political philosophy follows his materialistic and mechanistic conception of man, and should be understood in the light of the one principle that rules over all his system: the movement of bodies. Lukac intends to show the unity and interdependence of the English philosopher’s thought, describing it as a deductive process from a mechanistic theory of nature to civil philosophy. Through exposition, she highlights two especially relevant features for her argument: the reduction of all (...) causes to efficient and material causes, and the mechanistic conception of Man that gives unity to Hobbes’s system. (shrink)

In this collection of seven essays Leo J. Elders, S. V. D. reaches a remarkable combination of clarity, elegance, and flowing exposition with depth and good sense in the analysis and application of Thomas Aquinas's philosophy on contemporary issues. Inspired by the Croat proverb “a fish rots starting from the head,” the Thomist scholar calls for going back to basics in order to correct mistakes, fortify morality, and renew ideals in our decadent modern society. These “basics” concerning man, nature, culture (...) and a balanced relationship among them, along with a sound exposition about the conciliation between natural reason and supernatural revelation, may be found, according to the author, in the philosophy of Aquinas. (shrink)