4 found
  1. Taking Phenomenology at Face Value: The Priority of State Consciousness in Light of the For-me-ness of Experience.Alberto Barbieri - 2023 - Argumenta.
    An important distinction lies between consciousness attributed to creatures, or subjects, (creature consciousness) and consciousness attributed to mental states (state consciousness). Most contemporary theories of consciousness aim at explaining what makes a mental state conscious, paying scant attention to the problem of creature consciousness. This attitude relies on a deeper, and generally overlooked, assumption that once an explanation of state consciousness is provided, one has also explained all the relevant features of creature consciousness. I call this the priority of state (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  2.  96
    The Debate on the Problem of For-me-ness: A Proposed Taxonomy.Alberto Barbieri - 2021 - Argumenta.
    Several philosophers claim that a mental state is phenomenally conscious only if it exhibits so-called for-me-ness, or subjective character, i.e., the fact that there is something it is like to be in a conscious state not just for everyone but only for the subject who undergoes it. Consequently, they stress, a proper explanation of consciousness requires to address the question of what the nature of for-me-ness is. This question forms what I call the problem of for-me-ness. Although the debate on (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  3.  22
    Specificity and reliability of prognostic indexes in intensive care evaluation: the spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage case.Alberto Barbieri, Cristina Pinna, Gian Paolo Basso, Rosella Molinari, Enrico Giuliani, Luca Fruggeri & Massimo Nolli - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (2):242-245.
  4.  13
    Acute myocardial infarction – from territory to definitive treatment in an Italian province.Enrico Giuliani, Sara Lazzerotti, Giuseppe Fantini, Elisa Guerri, Carlo Serantoni, Maria Grazia Modena & Alberto Barbieri - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1071-1075.