8 found
Order:
  1.  26
    Obligation, Free Choice, and the Logic of Weakest Permissions.Albert J. J. Anglberger, Nobert Gratzl & Olivier Roy - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):807-827.
    We introduce a new understanding of deontic modals that we callobligations as weakest permissions. We argue for its philosophical plausibility, study its expressive power in neighborhood models, provide a complete Hilbert-style axiom system for it and show that it can be extended and applied to practical norms in decision and game theory.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2.  74
    Dynamic Deontic Logic and its Paradoxes.Albert J. J. Anglberger - 2008 - Studia Logica 89 (3):427-435.
    In Meyer’s promising account [7] deontic logic is reduced to a dynamic logic. Meyer claims that with his account “we get rid of most (if not all) of the nasty paradoxes that have plagued traditional deontic logic.” But as was shown by van der Meyden in [4], Meyer’s logic also contains a paradoxical formula. In this paper we will show that another paradox can be proven, one which also effects Meyer’s “solution” to contrary to duty obligations and his logic in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3. An Exact Truthmaker Semantics for Permission and Obligation.Albert J. J. Anglberger, Johannes Korbmacher & Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2016 - In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications. pp. 16-31.
    We develop an exact truthmaker semantics for permission and obligation. The idea is that with every singular act, we associate a sphere of permissions and a sphere of requirements: the acts that are rendered permissible and the acts that are rendered required by the act. We propose the following clauses for permissions and obligations: -/- - a singular act is an exact truthmaker of Pφ iff every exact truthmaker of φ is in the sphere of permissibility of the act, and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4. Eine Reliabilistische Rechtfertigung des Wertes von Wissen Über Theorien.Albert J. J. Anglberger & Christian J. Feldbacher - 2011 - In Christoph Jäger & Winfried Löffler (eds.), Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreement. Papers of the 34th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2011. The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 11--13.
    In this contribution the socalled Meno-Problem will be discussed. With respect to theories the problem is the following question: Why is it epistemologically more valuable to know a true theory than to simply believe it? A classical answer in reabilist accounts to this problem refers to the value of the operation which is used for gathering knowledge. But there is a gap in the argumentation as far as one is not allowed to derive from this assumption the conclusion that also (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  1
    Neuer Atheismus Wissenschaftlich Betrachtet.Albert J. J. Anglberger & Paul Weingartner (eds.) - 2010 - Ontos.
    Der Atheismus erlebte in den letzten Jahren eine Renaissance. Durch verschiedene Publikationen wurde der Atheismus in der Offentlichkeit und in den Wissenschaften wieder zum Thema. Religioser Glaube sei mit einem wissenschaftlichen Weltbild nicht vereinbar, so viele Atheisten. Diese Bewegung fasst man unter dem Namen Neuer Atheismus zusammen. Aber ist tatsachlich etwas neu am neuen Atheismus? Gibt es in den modernen Naturwissenschaften noch einen Platz fur Gott? Konnen Argumente der neuen Atheisten uberzeugend zeigen, dass es unvernunftig und unwissenschaftlich ist, an die (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  8
    Richard Dawkins Hauptargument Wissenschaftstheoretisch Betrachtet.Albert J. J. Anglberger, Christian J. Feldbacher & Stefan H. Gugerell - 2010 - In Albert J. J. Anglberger & Paul Weingartner (eds.), Neuer Atheismus Wissenschaftlich Betrachtet. Ontos. pp. 181-197.
    Dieser Sammelband hat zum Ziel, moderne atheistische Richtungen kritisch und wissenschaftlich zu betrachten. Mit diesen modernen atheistischen Richtungen ist vor allem der in Oxford unterrichtende Biologe und Religionskritiker Richard Dawkins verknüpft, bekennender Gegner von Kreationismus, Intelligent Design und Theologie, der schon 1976 mit der Veröffentlichung seines Buches "Der Gotteswahn" in der breiten Öffentlichkeit auf sich aufmerksam machte. Auch in jüngerer Vergangenheit, und zwar im Jahr 2006, war Dawkins mit seinem Buch (Dawkins 2006) an einem erneuten Aufflammen einer vor allem in (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  13
    Hilbert-Style Axiom Systems for the Matrix-Based Logics RMQ − and RMQ.Albert J. J. Anglberger & Jonathan Lukic - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (5):985-1003.
    This paper deals with the axiomatizability problem for the matrix-based logics RMQ − and RMQ *. We present a Hilbert-style axiom system for RMQ −, and a quasi-axiomatization based on it for RMQ *. We further compare these logics to different well-known modal logics, and assess its status as relevance logics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Metaethische Bemerkungen zur religiösen Begründung der Moral.Albert J. J. Anglberger & Christian J. Feldbacher - 2014 - Erwägen - Wissen - Ethik / Deliberation - Knowledge - Ethics 25 (1):18--21.
    In this comment to Kehrer (2014) the relevance of atheistic argumentation in the domain of ethics as an important part of religion is sketched.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark