1.  16
    Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches.Hannah R. Snyder, Akira Miyake & Benjamin L. Hankin - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  2.  85
    How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.Akira Miyake, Naomi P. Friedman, David A. Rettinger, Priti Shah & Mary Hegarty - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (4):621.
  3.  71
    The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach.Priti Shah & Akira Miyake - 1996 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 (1):4.
  4.  18
    Individual differences in working memory: Introduction to the special section.Akira Miyake - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2):163.
  5.  3
    Variation in Working Memory.Andrew R. A. Conway, Michael J. Kane, Akira Miyake & John N. Towse (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press USA.
    Working memory--the ability to keep important information in mind while comprehending, thinking, and acting--varies considerably from person to person and changes dramatically during each person's life. Understanding such individual and developmental differences is crucial because working memory is a major contributor to general intellectual functioning. This volume offers a state-of-the-art, integrative, and comprehensive approach to understanding variation in working memory by presenting explicit, detailed comparisons of the leading theories. It incorporates views from the different research groups that operate on each (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  19
    Trait worry is associated with difficulties in working memory updating.Daniel E. Gustavson & Akira Miyake - 2016 - Cognition and Emotion 30 (7).
  7.  16
    Good interactions are hard to find.Akira Miyake, Michael J. Emerson & Naomi P. Friedman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):108-109.
    Caplan & Waters's arguments for separate working memory subsystems for “interpretive” and “post-interpretive” comprehension processes do not have a solid empirical basis. The likely involvement of a separate phonological loop makes their memory-load data irrelevant to theory evaluation, and the lack of statistical power from nonoptimal experimental designs and analyses unfairly reduces the chances of detecting the relevant interactions.
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation