Order:
Disambiguations
Aaron J. Ancell [4]Aaron Ancell [4]
See also
Aaron J. Ancell
Bentley University
  1.  38
    How to Allow Conscientious Objection in Medicine While Protecting Patient Rights.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Aaron J. Ancell - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (1):120-131.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2. Democracy Isn't That Smart : On Landemore's Democratic Reason.Aaron Ancell - 2017 - Episteme 14 (2):161-175.
    In her recent book, Democratic Reason, Hélène Landemore argues that, when evaluated epistemically, “a democratic decision procedure is likely to be a better decision procedure than any non-democratic decision procedures, such as a council of experts or a benevolent dictator” (p. 3). Landemore's argument rests heavily on studies of collective intelligence done by Lu Hong and Scott Page. These studies purport to show that cognitive diversity – differences in how people solve problems – is actually more important to overall group (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  35
    The Fact of Unreasonable Pluralism.Aaron Ancell - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (4):410-428.
    Proponents of political liberalism standardly assume that the citizens of an ideal liberal society would be overwhelmingly reasonable. I argue that this assumption violates political liberalism's own constraints of realism—constraints that are necessary to frame the central problem that political liberalism aims to solve, that is, the problem of reasonable pluralism. To be consistent with these constraints, political liberalism must recognize that, as with reasonable pluralism, widespread support for unreasonable moral and political views is an inevitable feature of any liberal (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  28
    Political Irrationality, Utopianism, and Democratic Theory.Aaron Ancell - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (1):3-21.
    People tend to be biased and irrational about politics. Should this constrain what our normative theories of democracy can require? David Estlund argues that the answer is ‘no’. He contends that even if such facts show that the requirements of a normative theory are very unlikely to be met, this need not imply that the theory is unduly unrealistic. I argue that the application of Estlund’s argument to political irrationality depends on a false presupposition: mainly, that being rational about politics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  21
    Democratic Theory for a Market Democracy: The Problem of Merriment and Diversion When Regulators and the Regulated Meet.Wayne Norman & Aaron Ancell - 2018 - Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (4):536-563.
  6.  53
    Empiricism and Normative Ethics: What Do the Biology and the Psychology of Morality Have to Do with Ethics?Owen Flanagan, Aaron J. Ancell, Stephen Martin & Gordon Steenbergen - 2014 - Behaviour 151 (2-3).
    What do the biology and psychology of morality have to do with normative ethics? Our answer is, a great deal. We argue that normative ethics is an ongoing, ever-evolving research program in what is best conceived as human ecology.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  21
    Ethics & Empiricism: What Do the Biology and the Psychology of Morality Have to Do with Ethics?Owen Flanagan, Aaron J. Ancell, Stephen Martin & Gordon Steenbergen - 2014 - In Frans de Waal, Patricia Smith Churchland, Telmo Pievani & Stefano Parmigiani (eds.), Evolved Morality: The Biology and Philosophy of Human Conscience. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. pp. 73-92.
    What do the biology and psychology of morality have to do with normative ethics? Our answer is, a great deal.We argue that normative ethics is an ongoing, ever-evolving research program in what is best conceived as human ecology.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  11
    The Need for Feasible Compromises on Conscientious Objection: Response to Card.Aaron J. Ancell & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (8):560-561.
    Robert Card criticises our proposal for managing some conscientious objections in medicine. Unfortunately, he severely mischaracterises the nature of our proposal, its scope and its implications. He also overlooks the fact that our proposal is a compromise designed for a particular political context. We correct Card’s mischaracterisations, explain why we believe compromise is necessary and explain how we think proposed compromises should be evaluated.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark