5 found
  1.  77
    Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):41-58.
    :In this paper, the influence of speech act theory and Grice’s the- ory of conversational implicature on the study of argumentation is discussed. First, the role that pragmatic insights play in van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation and Jackson and Jacobs’ conver- sational approach to argumentation is described. Next, a number of examples of recent work by argumentation scholars is presented in which insights from speech act theory play a prominent role.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  44
    Manoeuvring Strategically with Praeteritio.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):339-350.
    This paper investigates the role that the stylistic device of praeteritio (or paralipsis) can play in arguers’ attempts to reconcile their rhetorical with their dialectical aims by manoeuvring strategically when carrying out particular discussion moves of the dialectical procedure for resolving a dispute. First, attention will be paid to the ways in which praeteritio can be realized in discourse. Next, an analysis is given of the effects the use of praeteritio may have as a result of the presentational means that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  19
    Comments On `Analyzing Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining "Person" and "Human Life" in Constitutional Disputes Over Abortion'.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):333-338.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  4.  14
    Walton's Scare Tactics Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (3).
  5.  67
    State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation. [REVIEW]A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):447-473.
    In this paper, a survey is presented of the main approaches to the structure of argumentation. The paper starts with a historical overview of the distinctions between various types of argument structure. Next, the main definitions given in the various approaches are discussed as well as the methods that are proposed to deal with doubtful cases.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   14 citations