Results for ' eyelid conditioning'

962 found
Order:
  1.  32
    Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
  2.  17
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.Evelyn G. Walker - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (5):303.
  3.  28
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS.Malcolm D. Gynther - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (6):408.
  4.  15
    Differential eyelid conditioning to verbal stimuli varying in formal similarity.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):9.
  5.  21
    Differential eyelid conditioning under equated drive as a function of the reinforcing UCS.Kenneth W. Spence & Blaine F. Tandler - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):35.
  6.  21
    Differential eyelid conditioning based on opposing instrumental contingencies.Suzanne E. Kwaterski & John W. Moore - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):547.
  7.  33
    Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.Leonard E. Ross & Kenneth W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6):379.
  8.  19
    Eyelid conditioning performance as a function of emotion-producing instructions.Kenneth W. Spence & Henry Goldstein - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):291.
  9.  31
    Eyelid conditioning performance when the mode of reinforcement is changed from classical to instrumental avoidance and vice versa.Joseph B. Hellige & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):710.
  10.  19
    (1 other version)Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):417.
  11.  24
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
  12.  26
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
  13.  21
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
  14.  26
    Differential eyelid conditioning: Establishing differential responding prior to varying the probability of reinforcement.Frederick L. Newman & Julian Woodhouse - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):146.
  15.  25
    Eyelid conditioned responses with various levels of anxiety.Martin R. Baron & James P. Connor - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (5):310.
  16.  36
    Transfer of differential eyelid conditioning through successive discriminations.David A. Grant, C. Michael Levy, Johanna Thompson, Craig W. Hickok & Dennis C. Bunde - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):246.
  17.  23
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement.Frederick L. Newman - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):412.
  18.  28
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
  19.  19
    The associative factor in eyelid conditioning.Gregory A. Kimble & Robert H. Dufort - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (6):386.
  20.  25
    Simultaneous performance in eyelid conditioning and probability learning as a function of puff intensity.Alan L. Bernstein & Edward F. Rutledge - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):22.
  21.  18
    Anxiety and eyelid conditioning.Mark Ominsky & Gregory A. Kimble - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):471.
  22.  48
    Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
  23.  13
    Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS.Kenneth W. Spence - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):57.
  24.  31
    Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.Gregory A. Kimble, Lucie I. Mann & Robert H. Dufort - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):407.
  25.  16
    Performance in eyelid conditioning related to changes in muscular tension and physiological measures of emotionality.W. N. Runquist & K. W. Spence - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (6):417.
  26.  19
    Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning.Paul Schnur & Charles J. Ksir - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):388.
  27.  12
    Differential human eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement and CS similarity.Gail B. Peterson & Frederick L. Newman - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):318.
  28.  18
    Differential rabbit eyelid conditioning as a function of age, interstimulus interval, and cue similarity.Peter W. Frey - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):326.
  29.  19
    Effect of instructions upon eyelid conditioning.Margaret F. Nicholls & Gregory A. Kimble - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):400.
  30.  12
    Performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration.W. N. Runquist & K. W. Spence - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):249.
  31.  29
    Response mediated generalization in eyelid conditioning with reduced conflicting information.G. Robert Grice, Kerm Henriksen & Jeffrey M. Speiss - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):398.
  32.  38
    Transfer of eyelid conditioning from instrumental to classical reinforcement and vice versa.David A. Grant, Neal E. A. Kroll, Barry Kantowitz, Michael J. Zajano & Kenneth B. Solberg - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):503.
  33.  13
    Sensitization and association in eyelid conditioning.D. A. Grant - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (3):201.
  34.  21
    Performance in eyelid conditioning following interpolated presentations of the UCS.K. P. Goodrich, L. E. Ross & A. R. Wagner - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):214.
  35.  19
    Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS.M. A. Trapold & K. W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):209.
  36.  24
    Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.
  37.  28
    Differential eyelid conditioning: The generalization of reinforcement and of nonreinforcement.Frederick L. Newman, James C. Francis, Alice West & Diane Covey - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (6):433-436.
  38.  18
    The Decline of a Research Speciality: Human-Eyelid Conditioning in the Late 1960's.S. R. Coleman & Sandra Webster - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (1):19 - 42.
    Human-eyelid conditioning was the principal source of information on Pavlovian conditioning, especially human, in the 1950s and 1960s, but it suffered a sharp decline in productivity, beginning in the late 1960s. The present article treats the decline as a case study with potential implications concerning the survival contingencies of research specialties. We make use of questionnaire data from eyelid-conditioning researchers and examine a variety of publication, topic-of-investigation, and institutional data to identify the major factors in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  31
    Differential classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning.Dominic W. Massaro & John W. Moore - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):151.
  40.  17
    Truth and falsity of verbal statements as conditioned stimuli in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):178.
  41.  28
    Effects of stimulus complexity, interstimulus interval, and masking task conditions in differential eyelid conditioning.Melanie J. Mayer & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):469.
  42.  26
    Replicability of an optimal delay of reinforcement result in instrumental eyelid conditioning.Louise E. Cerekwicki, Barry H. Kantowitz & David A. Grant - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):189.
  43.  30
    Cardiac orienting during "good" and "poor" differential eyelid conditioning.Lois E. Putnam, Leonard E. Ross & Frances K. Graham - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):563.
  44.  51
    Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy, Harvey C. Ebel & Donald D. Thompson - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):138.
  45.  16
    Ready signals and the effect of interpolated UCS presentations in eyelid conditioning.Robert H. Dufort & Gregory A. Kimble - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):1.
  46.  21
    (1 other version)Response topography in the acquisition of differential eyelid conditioning.Michael J. Zajano & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1115.
  47.  26
    Work and rest factors in eyelid conditioning.Simon Vandermeer & Abram Amsel - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):261.
  48.  19
    A comparison of avoidance and nonavoidance eyelid conditionings.Frank A. Logan - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):390.
  49.  26
    CS intensity and CS-UCS interval effects in human eyelid conditioning.Harold D. Fishbein, Paul D. Jones & Colin Silverthorne - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):109.
  50.  37
    Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
1 — 50 / 962