- The Nature and Value of Vagueness in the Law.Hrafn Ásgeirsson - 2020 - Oxford: Hart Publishing.details
|
|
Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.details
|
|
General theory of law and state.Hans Kelsen - 1945 - Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange. Edited by Hans Kelsen.details
|
|
An Introduction to Reasoning.Stephen Toulmin, Richard D. Rieke & Allan Janik - 1979 - New York and London: Macmillan.details
|
|
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law.Henry Prakken - 1993 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The idea of justice and the problem of argument.Chaim Perelman - 1963 - New York,: Humanities Press.details
|
|
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.details
|
|
Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games.Minghui Xiong & Frank Zenker - 2017 - Argumentation 32 (2):197-211.details
|
|
The Uses of Argument.Frederick L. Will & Stephen Toulmin - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (3):399.details
|
|
Padua: A protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules. [REVIEW]Maya Wardeh, Trevor Bench-Capon & Frans Coenen - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):183-215.details
|
|
When expert opinion evidence goes wrong.Douglas Walton - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (4):369-401.details
|
|
Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):217-246.details
|
|
Is there a burden of questioning?Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (1):1-43.details
|
|
Argument from analogy in legal rhetoric.Douglas Walton - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):279-302.details
|
|
Abstract argumentation systems.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence 90 (1-2):225-279.details
|
|
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):347-371.details
|
|
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.details
|
|
The burden of criticism.Jan van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.details
|
|
The authority of law: essays on law and morality.Joseph Raz - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Authority, Law and Morality.Joseph Raz - 1985 - The Monist 68 (3):295-324.details
|
|
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.Henry Prakken - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):303-320.details
|
|
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning.H. Prakken & G. Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):331-368.details
|
|
Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.details
|
|
On Law and Reason.Aleksander Peczenik - 1989 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
The Various Relations between Law and Morality in Contemporary Legal Philosophy.Michael S. Moore - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (4):435-471.details
|
|
Procedural Justice: Allocating to Individuals.Michael A. Menlowe & Michael D. Bayles - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (171):268.details
|
|
The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality.David Lyons & Joseph Raz - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (3):461.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.details
|
|
Analogy argumentation in law: A dialectical perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.details
|
|
Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model.David Hitchcock - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):373-391.details
|
|
Hard cases: A procedural approach. [REVIEW]Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes & Arno R. Lodder - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (2):113-167.details
|
|
A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match.Jaap Hage - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):199-273.details
|
|
The pleadings game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.details
|
|
Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model.G. Thomas Goodnight - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (1).details
|
|
Dialectical situations and argument analysis.James B. Freeman - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (2).details
|
|
A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning.Kathleen Freeman & Arthur M. Farley - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):163-197.details
|
|
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning.A. Bondarenko, P. M. Dung, R. A. Kowalski & F. Toni - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence 93 (1-2):63-101.details
|
|
Did he jump or was he pushed?: Abductive practical reasoning.Floris Bex, Trevor Bench-Capon & Katie Atkinson - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (2):79-99.details
|
|
The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argument. [REVIEW]T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):79-94.details
|
|
Norms and value based reasoning: justifying compliance and violation.Trevor Bench-Capon & Sanjay Modgil - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1):29-64.details
|
|
HYPO's legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.details
|
|
Argument in artificial intelligence and law.Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.details
|
|
Legal proof and fact finders' beliefs.Jordi Ferrer Beltrán - 2006 - Legal Theory 12 (4):293-314.details
|
|
Did he jump or was he pushed?: Abductive practical reasoning.Katie Atkinson - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (2):79-99.details
|
|
The Nature of Legal Philosophy.Robert Alexy - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (2):156-167.details
|
|
Conflicts of norms and the revision of normative systems.Carlos E. Alchourrón - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (4):413 - 425.details
|
|
Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.details
|
|