Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent.Graham Priest - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    In Contradiction advocates and defends the view that there are true contradictions, a view that flies in the face of orthodoxy in Western philosophy since Aristotle. The book has been at the center of the controversies surrounding dialetheism ever since its first publication in 1987. This second edition of the book substantially expands upon the original in various ways, and also contains the author’s reflections on developments over the last two decades. Further aspects of dialetheism are discussed in the companion (...)
  • In Contradiction, A Study of the Transconsistent.Joel M. Smith - 1991 - Noûs 25 (3):380-383.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent.N. C. A. Da Costa - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):498-502.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • Gaps and Gluts: Reply to Parsons.Graham Priest - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):57 - 66.
    1 IntroductionNumerous solutions have been proposed to the semantic paradoxes. Two that are frequently singled out and compared are the following. The first is that according to which paradoxical sentences are neither true nor false — as it is sometimes put, they are semantic gaps. The second is that according to which paradoxical sentences are both true and false — as it is sometimes put, they are semantic gluts. Calling the first of these a solution is, in fact, somewhat misleading: (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Everett's trilogy.Graham Priest - 1996 - Mind 105 (420):631-647.
  • Boolean negation and all that.Graham Priest - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):201 - 215.
    We have seen that proofs of soundness of (Boolean) DS, EFQ and of ABS — and hence the legitimation of these inferences — can be achieved only be appealing to the very form of reasoning in question. But this by no means implies that we have to fall back on classical reasoning willy-nilly. Many logical theories can provide the relevant boot-strapping. Decision between them has, therefore, to be made on other grounds. The grounds include the many criteria familiar from the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • True Contradictions.Terence Parsons - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):335 - 353.
    In In Contradiction, Graham Priest shows, as clearly as anything like this can be shown, that it is coherent to maintain that some sentences can be both true and false at the same time. As a consequence, some contradictions are true, and an appreciation of this possibility advances our understanding of the nature of logic and language.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • Curry’s Paradox.Robert K. Meyer, Richard Routley & J. Michael Dunn - 1979 - Analysis 39 (3):124 - 128.
  • Absorbing dialetheia?Anthony Everett - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):413-420.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The inconsistency of certain formal logic.Haskell B. Curry - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):115-117.
  • The Inconsistency of Certain Formal Logics.Alonzo Church & Haskell B. Curry - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):170.
  • Tonk, Plonk and Plink.Nuel Belnap - 1962 - Analysis 22 (6):130-134.
  • Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):331-334.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations  
  • Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest - 1995 - Philosophy 71 (276):308-310.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   114 citations