Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Al-māhānī's commentary on the concept of ratio: Bijan Vahabzadeh.Bijan Vahabzadeh - 2002 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (1):9-52.
    The mathematician al-Māhānī is the author of one of the first commentaries on the fifth Book of Euclid's Elements which have been handed down to us. In this commentary, al-Māhānī intends to justify Definitions V. 5 and V. 7 of the Elements, which deal with the identity of ratios and with greater ratio, by starting from an anthyphairetic conception of ratio, and by proving the equivalence of the Euclidean and the anthyphairetic points of view. We will try in this paper (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • La Définition V. 8 desElémentsd'Euclide.B. Vitrac - 1996 - Centaurus 38 (2-3):97-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Applied Mathematics in Eleventh Century Al-Andalus: Ibn Mucadh al-Jayyan and his Computation of Astrological Houses and Aspects.Jan P. Hogendijk - 2005 - Centaurus 47 (2):87-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Al-khayyām's Conception of Ratio and Proportionality.Bijan Vahabzadeh - 1997 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (2):247-263.
    Nous avons cherch dcle sur le Livre V des ments d'Euclide, m; et notamment de traduire en anglais les passages que nous avons jug d'expliquer pourquoi certains maths lfinition des grandeurs proportionnelles que l'on trouve au dléments.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Two Commentaries on Euclid's Definition of Proportional Magnitudes.Bijan Vahabzadeh - 1994 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (1):181.
    Euclid's definition of proportional magnitudes in the Fifth Book of the Elements gave rise to many commentaries. We examine closely two of these commentaries, one by al-Jayy and the other by Saunderson. Both al-Jayy and Saunderson attempted to defend Euclid's definition by making explicit what Euclid had only implied. We show that the two authors explain Euclid's position in a virtually identical manner.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Latin Version of lbn Mu c ādh's Treatise “On Twilight and the Rising of Clouds”.A. Mark Smith - 1992 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 2 (1):83.
    Written by the 11th-century Spanish Arab, Abh Muhammad ibn MucnOn Twilight and the Rising of Cloudsdh's value of around 52 miles remained standard until the 17th century, when it was revised sharply downward in consideration of atmospheric refraction and barometric studies. The treatise itself survives in a single Hebrew exemplar, 25 Latin exemplars, and an Italian exemplar derived from the Latin. At the heart of this present study is a critical text based on a fullscale comparative transcription of 22 of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations