Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The additive group of the rationals does not have an automatic presentation.Todor Tsankov - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (4):1341-1351.
    We prove that the additive group of the rationals does not have an automatic presentation. The proof also applies to certain other abelian groups, for example, torsion-free groups that are p-divisible for infinitely many primes p, or groups of the form ⊕ p∈I Z(p ∞ ), where I is an infinite set of primes.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Automata presenting structures: A survey of the finite string case.Sasha Rubin - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):169-209.
    A structure has a (finite-string) automatic presentation if the elements of its domain can be named by finite strings in such a way that the coded domain and the coded atomic operations are recognised by synchronous multitape automata. Consequently, every structure with an automatic presentation has a decidable first-order theory. The problems surveyed here include the classification of classes of structures with automatic presentations, the complexity of the isomorphism problem, and the relationship between definability and recognisability.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Survey of automatic structures.Sasha Rubin, Werner DePauli-Schimanovich, T. U. Wien & Kurt Gödel-Ein Mathematischer Mythos - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):169-200.
    A structure has a automatic presentationif the elements of its domain can be named by finite strings in such a way that the coded domain and the coded atomic operations are recognised by synchronous multitape automata. Consequently, every structure with an automatic presentation has a decidable first-order theory. The problems surveyed here include the classification of classes of structures with automatic presentations, the complexity of the isomorphism problem, and the relationship between definability and recognisability.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Finite automata presentable Abelian groups.André Nies & Pavel Semukhin - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (3):458-467.
    We give new examples of FA presentable torsion-free abelian groups. Namely, for every n2, we construct a rank n indecomposable torsion-free abelian group which has an FA presentation. We also construct an FA presentation of the group in which every nontrivial cyclic subgroup is not FA recognizable.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • [Introduction].Wilfrid Hodges - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (4):865.
    We consider two formalisations of the notion of a compositionalsemantics for a language, and find some equivalent statements in termsof substitutions. We prove a theorem stating necessary and sufficientconditions for the existence of a canonical compositional semanticsextending a given partial semantics, after discussing what features onewould want such an extension to have. The theorem involves someassumptions about semantical categories in the spirit of Husserl andTarski.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  • An Application of Games to the Completeness Problem for Formalized Theories.A. Ehrenfeucht - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):281-282.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • An Uncountably Categorical Theory Whose Only Computably Presentable Model Is Saturated.Denis R. Hirschfeldt, Bakhadyr Khoussainov & Pavel Semukhin - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):63-71.
    We build an א₁-categorical but not א₀-categorical theory whose only computably presentable model is the saturated one. As a tool, we introduce a notion related to limitwise monotonic functions.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On strongly minimal sets.J. T. Baldwin & A. H. Lachlan - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):79-96.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Computable Models of Theories with Few Models.Bakhadyr Khoussainov, Andre Nies & Richard A. Shore - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (2):165-178.
    In this paper we investigate computable models of -categorical theories and Ehrenfeucht theories. For instance, we give an example of an -categorical but not -categorical theory such that all the countable models of except its prime model have computable presentations. We also show that there exists an -categorical but not -categorical theory such that all the countable models of except the saturated model, have computable presentations.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Describing groups.André Nies - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (3):305-339.
    Two ways of describing a group are considered. 1. A group is finite-automaton presentable if its elements can be represented by strings over a finite alphabet, in such a way that the set of representing strings and the group operation can be recognized by finite automata. 2. An infinite f.g. group is quasi-finitely axiomatizable if there is a description consisting of a single first-order sentence, together with the information that the group is finitely generated. In the first part of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • [Omnibus Review].H. Jerome Keisler - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (2):342-344.