Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life.Sarah Michaels, Catherine O’Connor & Lauren B. Resnick - 2007 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (4):283-297.
    Classroom discussion practices that can lead to reasoned participation by all students are presented and described by the authors. Their research emphasizes the careful orchestration of talk and tasks in academic learning. Parallels are drawn to the philosophical work on deliberative discourse and the fundamental goal of equipping all students to participate in academically productive talk. These practices, termed Accountable TalkSM, emphasize the forms and norms of discourse that support and promote equity and access to rigorous academic learning. They have (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Emotional Messages.Michael A. Gilbert - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):239-250.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.Michael A. Gilbert - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (3):245-264.
    Over the past 60 years there have been tremendous advances made in Argumentation Theory. One crucial advance has been the move from the investigation of static arguments to a concern with dialogic interactions in concrete contexts. This focus has entailed a slow shift toward involving both non-logical and non-discursive elements in the analysis of an argument. I argue that the traditional attitude Informal Logic has displayed toward emotion can be and ought be moderated. In particular, I examine the role of (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
    Coalescent argumentation is a normative ideal that involves the joining together of two disparate claims through recognition and exploration of opposing positions. By uncovering the crucial connection between a claim and the attitudes, beliefs, feelings, values and needs to which it is connected dispute partners are able to identify points of agreement and disagreement. These points can then be utilized to effect coalescence, a joining or merging of divergent positions, by forming the basis for a mutual investigation of non-conflictual options (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   168 citations  
  • Logique Naturelle Et Communications.Jean-Blaise Grise - 1996 - Presses Universitaires de France.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   127 citations  
  • The Place of Emotion in Argument.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Appeals to emotion—pity, fear, popular sentiment, and _ad hominem_ attacks—are commonly used in argumentation. Instead of dismissing these appeals as fallacious wherever they occur, as many do, Walton urges that each use be judged on its merits. He distinguished three main categories of evaluation. First, is it reasonable, even if not conclusive, as an argument? Second, is it weak and therefore open to critical questioning for argument? And third, is it fallacious? The third category is a strong charge that incurs (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • L'argumentation dans la langue.Jean-Claude Anscombre & Oswald Ducrot - 1984 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 174 (1):111-112.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   74 citations  
  • The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   693 citations  
  • Feelings.[author unknown] - 2011
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   133 citations  
  • Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   540 citations  
  • Fallacies.Charles L. Hamblin - 1970 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 33 (1):183-188.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  • The Place of Emotion in Argument.Douglas WALTON - 1992 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 29 (1):84-86.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations