Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Mathematical logic.Joseph R. Shoenfield - 1967 - Reading, Mass.,: Addison-Wesley.
    8.3 The consistency proof -- 8.4 Applications of the consistency proof -- 8.5 Second-order arithmetic -- Problems -- Chapter 9: Set Theory -- 9.1 Axioms for sets -- 9.2 Development of set theory -- 9.3 Ordinals -- 9.4 Cardinals -- 9.5 Interpretations of set theory -- 9.6 Constructible sets -- 9.7 The axiom of constructibility -- 9.8 Forcing -- 9.9 The independence proofs -- 9.10 Large cardinals -- Problems -- Appendix The Word Problem -- Index.
  • Mathematical Logic.Donald Monk - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):234-236.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   102 citations  
  • Mathematical Logic.J. Donald Monk - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):376-376.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  • Substitution and truth in quantum logic.Itamar Pitowsky - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):380-401.
    If p(x 1 ,...,x n ) and q(x 1 ,...,x n ) are two logically equivalent propositions then p(π (x 1 ),...,π (x n )) and q(π (x 1 ),...,π (x n )) are also logically equivalent where π is an arbitrary permutation of the elementary constituents x 1 ,...,x n . In Quantum Logic the invariance of logical equivalences breaks down. It is proved that the distribution rules of classical logic are in fact equivalent to the meta-linguistic rule of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Quantum mechanics and value definiteness.Itamar Pitowsky - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):154-156.
  • Betting on the outcomes of measurements: A bayesian theory of quantum probability.Itamar Pitowsky - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):395-414.
    We develop a systematic approach to quantum probability as a theory of rational betting in quantum gambles. In these games of chance, the agent is betting in advance on the outcomes of several (finitely many) incompatible measurements. One of the measurements is subsequently chosen and performed and the money placed on the other measurements is returned to the agent. We show how the rules of rational betting imply all the interesting features of quantum probability, even in such finite gambles. These (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Betting on the outcomes of measurements: a Bayesian theory of quantum probability.Itamar Pitowsky - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):395-414.
    We develop a systematic approach to quantum probability as a theory of rational betting in quantum gambles. In these games of chance the agent is betting in advance on the outcomes of several incompatible measurements. One of the measurements is subsequently chosen and performed and the money placed on the other measurements is returned to the agent. We show how the rules of rational betting imply all the interesting features of quantum probability, even in such finite gambles. These include the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Review: Robert M. Solovay, A Model of Set-Theory in which Every Set of Reals is Lebesgue Measurable. [REVIEW]Richard Laver - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (3):529-529.
  • Gleason's theorem is not constructively provable.Geoffrey Hellman - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (2):193 - 203.
  • Algebraic constraints on hidden variables.Arthur Fine & Paul Teller - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (7-8):629-636.
    In the contemporary discussion of hidden variable interpretations of quantum mechanics, much attention has been paid to the “no hidden variable” proof contained in an important paper of Kochen and Specker. It is a little noticed fact that Bell published a proof of the same result the preceding year, in his well-known 1966 article, where it is modestly described as a corollary to Gleason's theorem. We want to bring out the great simplicity of Bell's formulation of this result and to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Another no‐go theorem for hidden variable models of inaccurate spin 1 measurements.Thomas Breuer - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1368-1379.
    Uncertainty about the actual orientation of the measurement device has been claimed to open a loophole for hidden variable models of quantum mechanics. In this paper I describe the statistics of inaccurate spin measurements by unsharp spin observables. A no‐go theorem for hidden variable models of the inaccurate measurement statistics follows: There is a finite set of directions for which not all results of inaccurate spin measurements can be predetermined in a non‐contextual way. In contrast to an earlier theorem (Breuer (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Another No‐go Theorem for Hidden Variable Models of Inaccurate Spin 1 Measurements.Thomas Breuer - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1368-1379.
    Uncertainty about the actual orientation of the measurement device has been claimed to open a loophole for hidden variable models of quantum mechanics. In this paper I describe the statistics of inaccurate spin measurements by unsharp spin observables. A no-go theorem for hidden variable models of the inaccurate measurement statistics follows: There is a finite set of directions for which not all results of inaccurate spin measurements can be predetermined in a non-contextual way. In contrast to an earlier theorem [Breuer, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem.Helen Billinge - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):661-670.
    In this paper I wish to show that we can give a statement of a restricted form of Gleason's Theorem that is classically equivalent to the standard formulation, but that avoids the counterexample that Hellman gives in "Gleason's Theorem is not Constructively Provable".
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Logical Reflections On the Kochen-Specker Theorem.John L. Bell - unknown
    IN THEIR WELL-KNOWN PAPER, Kochen and Specker (1967) introduce the concept of partial Boolean algebra (pBa) and show that certain (finitely generated) partial Boolean algebras arising in quantum theory fail to possess morphisms to any Boolean algebra (we call such pBa's intractable in the sequel). In this note we begin by discussing partial..
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Deterministic model of spin and statistics.Itamar Pitowsky - unknown
    A deterministic model that accounts for the statistical behavior of random samples of identical particles is presented. The model is based on some nonmeasurable distribution of spin values in all directions. The mathematical existence of such distributions is proved by set-theoretical techniques, and the relation between these distributions and observed frequencies is explored within an appropriate extension of probability theory. The relation between quantum mechanics and the model is specified. The model is shown to be consistent with known polarization phenomena (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.J. S. Bell - 2004 - In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--13.
  • The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.Simon Kochen & E. P. Specker - 1967 - Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17:59--87.