Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.J. Savulescu - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):327-331.
    This paper argues that doctors ought to make all things considered value judgments about what is best for their patients. It illustrates some of the shortcomings of the model of doctor as 'fact-provider'. The 'fact-provider' model fails to take account of the fact that practising medicine necessarily involves making value judgments; that medical practice is a moral practice and requires that doctors reflect on what ought to be done, and that patients can make choices which fail to express their autonomy (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Existential autonomy: why patients should make their own choices.H. Madder - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):221-225.
    Savulescu has recently introduced the "rational non-interventional paternalist" model of the patient-doctor relationship. This paper addresses objections to such a model from the perspective of an anaesthetist. Patients need to make their own decisions if they are to be fully autonomous. Rational non-interventional paternalism undermines the importance of patient choice and so threatens autonomy. Doctors should provide an evaluative judgment of the best medical course of action, but ought to restrict themselves to helping patients to make their own choices rather (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Conscientious autonomy: Displacing decisions in health care.Rebecca Kukla - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (2):34-44.
    : The standard bioethics account is that respecting patient autonomy means ensuring patients make their own decisions. In fact, respecting patient autonomy often has more to do with the overall shape and meaning of patients' health care regimes, and sometimes, at least, patients will very reasonably defer to medical authority.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Conscientious Autonomy: Displacing Decisions in Health Care.Rebecca Kukla - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (2):34.
    The standard bioethics account is that respecting patient autonomy means ensuring that patients make their own decisions, and that requires that they give informed consent. In fact, respecting autonomy often has more to do with the overall shape and meaning of their health care regimes. Ideally, patients will sometimes take control of their health care but sometimes defer to medical authority. The physician's task is, in part, to inculcate patients into the appropriate good health care regimes.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Review of Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp: A History and Theory of Informed Consent[REVIEW]William G. Bartholome - 1988 - Ethics 98 (3):605-606.
  • Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
    Book reviewed in this article: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. By Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2160 citations  
  • The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions.Eric J. Cassell & Carl E. Schneider - 2000 - Hastings Center Report 30 (5):46.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
    Over the course of its first seven editions, Principles of Biomedical Ethics has proved to be, globally, the most widely used, authored work in biomedical ethics. It is unique in being a book in bioethics used in numerous disciplines for purposes of instruction in bioethics. Its framework of moral principles is authoritative for many professional associations and biomedical institutions-for instruction in both clinical ethics and research ethics. It has been widely used in several disciplines for purposes of teaching in the (...)