Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. In Varietate Concordia—United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Bart Garssen - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parliament. A parliamentary debate is a distinct argumentative activity type. In the pragma-dialectical approach, argumentative activity types are defined as conventionalized argumentative practices in which the possibilities for strategic manoeuvring are predetermined. What are the characteristics of the activity type of a debate in European Parliament that predetermine the possibilities for strategic manoeuvring? What kind of constraints and opportunities for strategic manoeuvring can be distinguished?
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?Dima Mohammed - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (3):307-322.
    In today’s ‘networked’ public sphere, arguers are faced with countless controversies roaming out there. Knowing what is at stake at any point in time, and keeping under control the contribution one’s arguments make to the different interrelated issues requires careful craft Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2011). In this paper, I explore the difficulty of determining what is at stake at any moment of the argumentative situation and explore the challenge (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments.Dima Mohammed - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):221-245.
    In this paper, I review and compare major literature on goals in argumentation scholarship, aiming to answer the question of how to take the different goals of arguers into account when analysing and evaluating public political arguments. On the basis of the review, I suggest to differentiate between the different goals along two important distinctions: first, distinguish between goals which are intrinsic to argumentation and goals which are extrinsic to it and second distinguish between goals of the act of arguing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • L'argumentation dans la langue.Jean-Claude Anscombre & Oswald Ducrot - 1984 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 174 (1):111-112.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   74 citations  
  • Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students.[author unknown] - 2012
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   72 citations  
  • Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - unknown
    Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between the pursuit of success and the maintenance of reasonableness. They elaborate on their earlier claim that this tension leads to ‘strategic manoeuvring’ that can be explained by making use of insights from dialectic and rhetoric. As a new step in their treatment of strategic manoeuvring they take account of the fact that the manoeuvring always takes place in one of the various argumentative ‘activity types’ that can be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Ch Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (4):249-254.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   365 citations  
  • Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (4):426-430.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   147 citations