Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Politics of Paradigms.George Reisch - 2019 - Albany, NY, USA: SUNY.
    The Politics of Paradigms shows that America’s most famous and influential book about science, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions of 1962, was inspired and shaped by Thomas Kuhn’s political interests, his relationship with the influential cold warrior James Bryant Conant, and America’s McCarthy-era struggle to resist and defeat totalitarian ideology. Through detailed archival research, Reisch shows how Kuhn’s well-known theories of paradigms, crises, and scientific revolutions emerged from within urgent political worries—on campus and in the public sphere—about the invisible, unconscious (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The relation of history of science to philosophy of science in.Vasso Kindi - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (4):495-530.
    : In this essay I argue that Kuhn's account of science, as it was articulated in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, was mainly defended on philosophical rather than historical grounds. I thus lend support to Kuhn's later claim that his model can be derived from first principles. I propose a transcendental reading of his work and I suggest that Kuhn uses historical examples as anti-essentialist Wittgensteinian "reminders" that expose a variegated landscape in the development of science.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Relation of History of Science to Philosophy of Science in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Kuhn's later philosophical work.Vasso Kindi - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (4):495-530.
    In this essay I argue that Kuhn's account of science, as it was articulated in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, was mainly defended on philosophical rather than historical grounds. I thus lend support to Kuhn's later claim that his model can be derived from first principles. I propose a transcendental reading of his work and I suggest that Kuhn uses historical examples as anti-essentialist Wittgensteinian "reminders" that expose a variegated landscape in the development of science.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The trouble with the historical philosophy of science.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass. (235 Holyoke Center, Cambridge 02138): Dept. of the History of Science, Harvard University.
  • The Role of Evidence in Judging Kuhn’s Model: On the Mizrahi, Patton, Marcum Exchange.Vasso Kindi - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (11):25-33.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Kuhnian Straw Man.Vasso Kindi - 2017 - In The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? London: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 95-112.
    In the present chapter, I argue that commentators who criticize Kuhn’s work are most often fighting a straw man. Their target is a stereotype that is not to be found in Kuhn’s texts. I will consider the charge based on the stereotype that the Kuhnian schema is not borne out by historical evidence and will argue that Kuhn’s model, which is not actually what his critics take it to be, was not supposed to be based on, or accurately depict, historical (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Discussion with Thomas Kuhn.Thomas Kuhn - 1995 - In James Conant & J. Haugeland (eds.), The Road Since Structure. University of Chicago Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations