Switch to: Citations

References in:

Is Rule-Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?

Analysis 54 (2):92 - 97 (1994)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Rule-consequentialism and demandingness: A reply to Carson.Brad Hooker - 1991 - Mind 100 (2):269-276.
    This paper replies to Carson's attacks on an earlier paper of Hooker's. Carson argued that rule-consequentialism--the theory that an act is morally right if and only if it is allowed by the set of rules and corresponding virtues the having of which by everyone would bring about the best consequences considered impartially--can and does require the comfortably off to make enormous sacrifices in order to help the needy. Hooker defends rule-consequentialism against Carson's arguments.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Human Good and the Ambitions of Consequentialism.James Griffin - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):118.
    I want to look at one aspect of the human good: how it serves as the basis for judgments about the moral right. One important view is that the right is always derived from the good. I want to suggest that the more one understands the nature of the human good, the more reservations one has about that view. I. One Route to Consequentialism Many of us think that different things make a life good, with no one deep value underlying (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Rule Consequentialism Is a Rubber Duck.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1993 - American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):271 - 278.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations