Switch to: Citations

References in:

Imagination and possibility

Philosophical Forum 38 (2):125–146 (2007)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):1-42.
  • The Inference to the Best Explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
  • Conceivability as a Test for Possibility.Paul Tidman - 1994 - American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (4):297-309.
  • The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):76-92.
  • Modal and Other a Priori Epistemology: How Can We Know What is Possible and What Impossible?Ernest Sosa - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (Supplement):1-16.
  • Imagination.Ilham Dilman & Hidé Ishiguro - 1967 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 41 (1):19-56.
  • Conceivability and the Cartesian Argument for Dualism.James van Cleve - 1983 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (January):35-45.
  • Imagining Oneself to Be Another.Steven L. Reynolds - 1989 - Noûs 23 (5):615-633.
    Imagining that I am Napoleon is not (normally) imagining an impossibility. It is (or at least may be) just adopting a first person way of imagining Napoleon. The images and bits of narrative using 'I' are intended to refer to Napoleon and his surroundings, in something like the way that a salt shaker can stand for a regiment of troops when the general says "This is the third regiment' while explaining his plans at the breakfast table.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations