Le traite d'Aristote intitule Categories est une des oeuvres du philosophe grec qui a suscite le plus de commentaires depuis l'Antiquite jusqu'a nos jours. La tradition voulait que la logique aristotelicienne commencat avec la logique des termes exposee dans les Categories, puis se poursuivit avec une logique des propositions dans le De interpretatione, pour se clore avec la logique de l'argumentation dont traitent les Premiers analytiques. En realite, les Categories sont bien plus qu'une simple logique des termes. L'ouvrage traite en (...) effet des choses qui se disent sans connexion et est ainsi une porte ouverte vers l'ontologie et la metaphysique. Le lecteur trouvera ainsi dans l'introduction de la presente edition des rapprochements entre les Categories et les Topiques d'une part et la Metaphysique d'autre part. Le titre du traite, qui vient du verbe dont use Aristote pour signifier l'acte de prediquer renvoie aux 10 categories indiquees au chapitre 4 et qui sont la substance, la quantite, la qualite, le relatif, le lieu, le temps, le positionnement, la tenue, le faire et le subir. L'edition des Categories dans la Collection des Universites de France comporte le texte grec du traite accompagne de la traduction en francais de Richard Bodeus. Le traite est precede d'une riche introduction dans laquelle sont debattues les questions de son titre et de son authenticite. Dans cette introduction, Richard Bodeus replace les Categories dans l'ensemble de l'oeuvre d'Aristote et decrit de maniere precise la tradition manuscrite du texte. En appendice, le lecteur trouvera un apparat critique detaille ainsi qu'un ensemble de notes qui favoriseront la lecture du texte. (shrink)

„Die ‚Geschichte des Aristotelismus‘ (3 Bände, 1971-2001), die Paul Moraux auf der Basis seiner jahrzehntelangen Beschäftigung mit Aristoteles und des von ihm gegründeten Aristotelesarchivs geschaffen hat, ist ein Maßstäbe setzendes Meisterwerk der Philosophiegeschichte.“ Prof. Dr. Bernd Seidensticker, Freie Universität Berlin.

Richard Sorabji presents a ground-breaking study of ancient Greek views of the emotions and their influence on subsequent theories and attitudes, Pagan and Christian. While the central focus of the book is the Stoics, Sorabji draws on a vast range of texts to give a rich historical survey of how Western thinking about this central aspect of human nature developed.

The Stoic Idea of the City offers the first systematic analysis of the Stoic school, concentrating on Zeno's Republic . Renowned classical scholar Malcolm Schofield brings together scattered and underused textual evidence, examining the Stoic ideals that initiated the natural law tradition of Western political thought. A new foreword by Martha Nussbaum and a new epilogue written by the author further secure this text as the standard work on Presocratic Stoics. "The account emerges from a jigsaw-puzzle of items from a (...) wide range of authorities, painstakingly pieced together and then annotated in a series of appendixes, the whole executed with fine scholarship, clarity, and good humor."-- Times Literary Supplement. (shrink)

The purpose of the paper is to defend a modified version of the report given by Strabo about the transmission of the writings of Aristotle during the Hellenistic period. The basic dilemma was pointed out by Dom Jean Liron in 1717: The existence of our Corpus Aristotelicum entails that Strabo must be exaggerating either in assuming that the manuscripts brought by Neleus to Scepsis were the only manuscripts of the Aristotelian and Theophrastean writings, or in asserting that these manuscripts were (...) severely damaged. Many writings of our Corpus are missing in the Hellenistic catalogue of Aristotle's works while they are listed in the later catalogue of Ptolemy al-Gharïb; furthermore, the single books of the transmitted treatises are labelled by means of the pre-Hellenistic system of 24 letter labels, whereas in the Hellenistic catalogue the single books are numbered by means of the Hellenistic system of 27 alphabetic numerals. This suggests that the treatises missing in the Hellenistic catalogue formed part of a collection which was inaccessible in Hellenistic times and which, therefore, preserved the pre-Hellenistic system of book-labelling. After the rediscovery of the collection its system of book-labelling was maintained by the editors who laid the foundations of our Corpus. The same criterion reveals the Eudemian Ethics in eight books to be a later compilation. (shrink)

The concept of o or "pre-emotions" is known not only to the Roman Stoics and Christian exegetes but also to Philo of Alexandria. Philo also supplies the term o at QGen 1.79. As Philo cannot have derived what he knows from Seneca (despite his visit to Rome in 39), nor from Cicero, who also mentions the point, he must have found it in older Stoic writings. The o concept, rich in implications for the voluntariness and phenomenology of the passions proper, (...) is thus confirmed for the Hellenistic period. It is not to be expected that Philo's handling of this or any concept will necessarily conform to the usage of his Stoic sources. His evidence is nonetheless of great value where it coincides with that of other witnesses. In QGen 4.73 the emphasis falls upon involuntariness and the mechanisms of impression and assent as in Epictetus fr. 9. The o saves the virtuous person's insusceptibility to emotion exactly as it does for the Stoic spokesman in Gellius NA 19.1; this point is of some interest in view of the Christological use of this concept in Origen and Didymus. QGen 1.55 and 3.56 indicate that the occurrence of the o is dependent upon uncertainty, and further, that for Philo, as for Seneca in Ira 2.3.4, a thought not acted upon can count as a o. In QGen 4.15-17 and 1.79, Philo indicates that hope and perhaps laughter may be related to joy as o to o; these assertions are not paralleled in extant Stoic texts. Further, in QGen 2.57, he names "biting and contraction" as the shrink)

The concept of πρoπαειαι or "pre-emotions" is known not only to the Roman Stoics and Christian exegetes but also to Philo of Alexandria. Philo also supplies the term πρoπαεια at QGen 1.79. As Philo cannot have derived what he knows from Seneca, nor from Cicero, who also mentions the point, he must have found it in older Stoic writings. The πρoπαεια concept, rich in implications for the voluntariness and phenomenology of the passions proper, is thus confirmed for the Hellenistic period. (...) It is not to be expected that Philo's handling of this or any concept will necessarily conform to the usage of his Stoic sources. His evidence is nonetheless of great value where it coincides with that of other witnesses. In QGen 4.73 the emphasis falls upon involuntariness and the mechanisms of impression and assent as in Epictetus fr. 9. The πρoπαεια saves the virtuous person's insusceptibility to emotion exactly as it does for the Stoic spokesman in Gellius NA 19.1; this point is of some interest in view of the Christological use of this concept in Origen and Didymus. QGen 1.55 and 3.56 indicate that the occurrence of the πρoπαειαι is dependent upon uncertainty, and further, that for Philo, as for Seneca in Ira 2.3.4, a thought not acted upon can count as a πρoπαεια. In QGen 4.15-17 and 1.79, Philo indicates that hope and perhaps laughter may be related to joy as πρoπαεια to παoς; these assertions are not paralleled in extant Stoic texts. Further, in QGen 2.57, he names "biting and contraction" as the ευπαεια corresponding to grief, supplying a helpful parallel for Cic. Tusc. 3.83 and Plut. Virt. Mor. 449a. The topic may well have been discussed by Posidonius, as suggested by Cooper and others, but Posidonius' attested innovations are rather different in character from the points which have caught the attention of Philo. Taking together the indirect evidence of Philo, Seneca, and Cicero, we may reasonably infer that the πρoπαεια concept belonged already to an earlier period of Stoicism. (shrink)

Volume 1 presents the texts in new translations by the authors, and these are accompanied by a philosophical and historical commentary designed for use by all readers, including those with no background in the classical world. With its glossary and indexes, this volume can stand alone as an independent tool of study.

Aucun manuel de philosophie ni aucune encyclopédie ne nous avait procuré jusqu'ici un dictionnaire exhaustif des philosophes de l'Antiquité. Exhaustivité dans la liste des auteurs, connus ou pas, mais aussi dans la présentation des sources, puisque Richard Goulet et son équipe mobilisent textes littéraires grecs, documents iconographiques, papyrologiques, épigraphiques, sources arméniennes, géorgiennes, hébraïques, syriaques et arabes. Des présocratiques aux néoplatoniciens du VIe siècle, d'Athènes à Byzance, de Rome à Alexandrie, ce chef-d'œuvre d'érudition offre un regard vraiment universel sur les auteurs (...) et les systèmes de pensée qui continuent d'irradier jusqu'à nous. Ce nouveau volume, particulièrement important, contient entre autres les notices Parménide, Philon d'Alexandrie, Philostrate, Photios, Platon... et analyse la survie de leurs œuvres philosophiques dans la littérature du christianisme ou de l'Islam. Un travail colossal et internationalement reconnu, qui honore la tradition scientifique française. (shrink)

The mutual interaction of philosophy and Roman political and cultural life has aroused more and more interest in recent years among students of classical literature, Roman history, and ancient philosophy. In this volume, which gathers together some of the papers originally delivered at a series of seminars in the University of Oxford, scholars from all three disciplines explore the role of Platonism and Aristotelianism in Roman intellectual, cultural, and political life from the second century BC to the third century AD.