Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Intergenerational Impartiality: Replacing Discounting by Probability Weighting.Ng Yew-Kwang - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):237-257.
    Intergenerational impartiality requires putting the welfare of future generations at par with that of our own. However, rational choice requires weighting all welfare values by the respective probabilities of realization. As the risk of non-survival of mankind is strictly positive for all time periods and as the probability of non-survival is cumulative, the probability weights operate like discount factors, though justified on a morally justifiable and completely different ground. Impartial intertemporal welfare maximization is acceptable, though the welfare of people in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    Challenging, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity, Parfit claims that we have a false view about our own nature. It is often rational to act against our own best interersts, he argues, and most of us have moral views that are self-defeating. We often act wrongly, although we know there will be no one with serious grounds for complaint, and when we consider future generations it is very hard to avoid conclusions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2794 citations  
  • Intergenerational impartiality: Replacing discounting by probability weighting. [REVIEW]Yew-Kwang Ng - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):237-257.
    Intergenerational impartiality requires putting the welfare of future generations at par with that of our own. However, rational choice requires weighting all welfare values by the respective probabilities of realization. As the risk of non-survival of mankind is strictly positive for all time periods and as the probability of non-survival is cumulative, the probability weights operate like discount factors, though justified on a morally justifiable and completely different ground. Impartial intertemporal welfare maximization is acceptable, though the welfare of people in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What Should We Do About Future Generations?Yew-Kwang Ng - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):235.
    Parfit's requirements for an ideal Theory X cannot be fully met since the Mere Addition Principle and Non-Antiegalitarianism imply the Repugnant Conclusion: Theory X does not exist. However, since the Repugnant Conclusion is really compelling, the Impersonal Total Principle should be adopted for impartial comparisons concerning future generations. Nevertheless, where our own interests are affected, we may yet choose to be partial, trading off our concern for future goodness with our self-interests. Theory X' meets all Parfit's requirements except the Mere (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Ethics and Climate Change: A Commentary on MacCracken, Toman and Gardiner.Peter Singer - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (3):415 - 422.
    Climate change is an ethical issue, because it involves the distribution of a scarce resource – the capacity of the atmosphere to absorb our waste gases without producing consequences that no one wants. Various principles might be used to decide what distribution is just. This commentary argues that on any plausible principle, the industrialised nations should be doing much more than they are doing now, and much more than they are required to do by the Kyoto protocol, to reduce their (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Great harms from small benefits grow: how death can be outweighed by headaches.A. Norcross - 1998 - Analysis 58 (2):152-158.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Great Harms from small benefits grow: How death can be outweighed by headaches.Alastair Norcross - 1998 - Analysis 58 (2):152–158.
    Suppose that a very large number of people, say one billion, will suffer a moderately severe headache for the next twenty-four hours. For these billion people, the next twenty-four hours will be fairly unpleasant, though by no means unbearable. However, there will be no side-effects from these headaches; no drop in productivity in the work-place, no lapses in concentration leading to accidents, no unkind words spoken to loved ones that will later fester. Nonetheless, it is clearly desirable that these billion (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (2):135-167.
  • Mikro-Zertifikate.Olaf L. Müller - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 95 (2):167-198.
    Wie müsste eine faire Lösung des Klimaproblems aussehen? Wie sollten wir Pflichten und finanzielle Lasten der nötigen CO2-Reduktionen verteilen, wenn es dabei gerecht zugehen soll und keiner übervorteilt werden darf? In meiner Antwort auf diese ethischen Fragen stütze ich mich auf einen Grundsatz, den Angela Merkel formuliert hat: Jeder Mensch hat das Recht, genauso viel CO2-Emissionen zu verursachen wie jeder andere. Anders als die Bundeskanzlerin, die den Grundsatz nur langfristig in die Tat umsetzen will, plädiere ich dafür, dass die Gleichberechtigung (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Utilitarianism with a human face.Bernward Gesang - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (2):169-181.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Ethics and global climate change.Stephen M. Gardiner - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):555-600.
    Very few moral philosophers have written on climate change.1 This is puzzling, for several reasons. First, many politicians and policy makers claim that climate change is not only the most serious environmental problem currently facing the world, but also one of the most important international problems per se.2 Second, many of those working in other disciplines describe climate change as fundamentally an ethical issue.3.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   126 citations  
  • Environmental Ethics: An Overview for the Twenty-First Century.Robin Attfield - 2003 - Polity.
    In this clear, concise and up-to-date introduction to environmental ethics, Robin Attfield guides the student through the key issues and debates in this field in ways that will also be of interest to a wide range of scholars and researchers. The book introduces environmental problems and environmental ethics and surveys theories of the sources of the problems. Attfield also puts forward his own original contribution to the debates, advocating biocentric consequentialism among theories of normative ethics and defending objectivism in meta-ethics. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • One world: the ethics of globalization.Peter Singer - 2002 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
    In a new preface, Peter Singer discusses the prospects for the ethical approach he advocates."--BOOK JACKET.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   149 citations  
  • Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
    For thirty years, Peter Singer's Practical Ethics has been the classic introduction to applied ethics. For this third edition, the author has revised and updated all the chapters and added a new chapter addressing climate change, one of the most important ethical challenges of our generation. Some of the questions discussed in this book concern our daily lives. Is it ethical to buy luxuries when others do not have enough to eat? Should we buy meat from intensively reared animals? Am (...)
  • Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   519 citations  
  • [Enhancement between self-realization and self-deception].B. Gesang - 2006 - Ethik in der Medizin: Organ der Akademie für Ethik in der Medizin 18 (1):10-26.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • One World.Peter Singer - unknown
    If we agree with the notion of a global community, then we must extend our concepts of justice, fairness, and equity beyond national borders by supporting measures to decrease global warming and to increase foreign aid, argues Peter Singer.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations.Edward A. Page - 2007 - Environmental Values 16 (3):404-406.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations