Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Whose Sovereignty? Empire Versus International Law.Jean L. Cohen - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (3):1-24.
    Where there is an imperial project afoot to develop a version of global right to justify its self-interested interventions, it is dangerous to abandon the default position of sovereignty and the principle of nonintervention in international law.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Sovereign Equality Vs. Imperial Right: The Battle Over the “New World Order”.Jean L. Cohen - 2006 - Constellations 13 (4):485-505.
  • Habeas Corpus? Pierre Manent and the Politics of Europe.David Janssens - 2006 - European Journal of Political Theory 5 (2):171-190.
    This article examines and assesses Pierre Manent’s critique of the European political project and his concomitant endorsement of the nation-state. It first presents Manent’s basic arguments against the European Union, focusing on his Aristotelian understanding of political forms and his notion of the body politic. Subsequently, it argues that Manent’s position, in part due to its Aristotelian underpinnings, is deeply problematic, in that it disregards the contingency and the element of representation that are necessarily inherent in the foundation of every (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society.Jürgen Habermas - 2008 - Constellations 15 (4):444-455.
  • Cosmopolitan Republicanism: Citizenship, Freedom and Global Political Authority.James Bohman - 2001 - The Monist 84 (1):3-21.
    Cosmopolitanism and republicanism are both inherently political ideals. In most discussions, they are taken to have contrasting, if not conflicting, normative aspirations. Cosmopolitanism is “thin” and abstractly universal, unable to articulate the basis for a “thick” citizenship in a republican political community. This commonly accepted way of dividing up the conceptual and political terrain is, however, increasingly misleading in the age of the global transformation of political authority. Rather than centered on community, republicanism is in the first instance an ideal (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Tocqueville, European Integration and Free Moeurs.Larry Siedentop - 2007 - In Raf Geenens & Annelien de Dijn (eds.), Reading Tocqueville: From Oracle to Actor. Palgrave-Macmillan.