Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Evidence Against Linguistic Relativity in Chinese and English: A Case Study of Spatial and Temporal Metaphors.Chi-Shing Tse & Jeanette Altarriba - 2008 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 8 (3-4):335-357.
    To talk about time, English speakers often use horizontal spatial metaphors whereas Chinese speakers use both vertical and horizontal spatial metaphors. Boroditsky showed that while Chinese-English bilinguals were faster to verify a temporal target like June comes earlier than August after they had seen a vertical spatial prime rather than a horizontal spatial prime, English monolinguals showed the reverse pattern, thus supporting the linguistic relativity hypothesis. This finding was not conceptually replicated in January and Kako's six experiments for English monolinguals. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time Onto Spatial Frames of Reference.Ana Torralbo, Julio Santiago & Juan Lupiáñez - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (4):745-757.
    Flexibility in conceptual projection constitutes one of the most challenging issues in the embodiment and conceptual metaphor literatures. We sketch a theoretical proposal that places the burden of the explanation on attentional dynamics in interaction with mental models in working memory that are constrained to be maximally coherent. A test of this theory is provided in the context of the conceptual projection of time onto the domain of space. Participants categorized words presented at different spatial locations (back–front, left–right) as referring (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task.Orly Fuhrman & Lera Boroditsky - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (8):1430-1451.
    Across cultures people construct spatial representations of time. However, the particular spatial layouts created to represent time may differ across cultures. This paper examines whether people automatically access and use culturally specific spatial representations when reasoning about time. In Experiment 1, we asked Hebrew and English speakers to arrange pictures depicting temporal sequences of natural events, and to point to the hypothesized location of events relative to a reference point. In both tasks, English speakers (who read left to right) arranged (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time.Rafael E. Núñez & Eve Sweetser - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (3):401-450.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   85 citations  
  • On the Experiential Link Between Spatial and Temporal Language.Teenie Matlock, Michael Ramscar & Lera Boroditsky - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (4):655-664.
    How do we understand time and other entities we can neither touch nor see? One possibility is that we tap into our concrete, experiential knowledge, including our understanding of physical space and motion, to make sense of abstract domains such as time. To examine how pervasive an aspect of cognition this is, we investigated whether thought about a nonliteral type of motion called fictive motion (FM; as in The road runs along the coast) can influence thought about time. Our results (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.
    The now-classic Metaphors We Live By changed our understanding of metaphor and its role in language and the mind. Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Because such metaphors structure our most basic understandings of our experience, they are "metaphors we live by"--metaphors that can shape our perceptions and actions without our ever noticing them. In (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1150 citations  
  • Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001).David January & Edward Kako - 2007 - Cognition 104 (2):417-426.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized.Wim Gevers, Bert Reynvoet & Wim Fias - 2003 - Cognition 87 (3):B87-B95.
  • Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001).Jenn-Yeu Chen - 2007 - Cognition 104 (2):427-436.
    English uses the horizontal spatial metaphors to express time (e.g., the good days ahead of us). Chinese also uses the vertical metaphors (e.g., 'the month above' to mean last month). Do Chinese speakers, then, think about time in a different way than English speakers? Boroditsky [Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22] claimed that they do, and went on to conclude that 'language is a powerful tool in shaping habitual (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Time in the mind: Using space to think about time.Daniel Casasanto & Lera Boroditsky - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):579-593.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   116 citations  
  • Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.Lera Boroditsky - 2000 - Cognition 75 (1):1-28.
  • Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?Lera Boroditsky, Orly Fuhrman & Kelly McCormick - 2011 - Cognition 118 (1):123-129.
    Time is a fundamental domain of experience. In this paper we ask whether aspects of language and culture affect how people think about this domain. Specifically, we consider whether English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently. We review all of the available evidence both for and against this hypothesis, and report new data that further support and refine it. The results demonstrate that English and Mandarin speakers do think about time differently. As predicted by patterns in language, Mandarin speakers (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.Lera Boroditsky - 2001 - Cognitive Psychology 43:1-22.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   105 citations  
  • How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English and Greek.Daniel Casasanto, Olga Fotokopolou, Ria Pita & Lera Boroditsky - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations