Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Student Responses II.Kenneth L. Kraft & Anusorn Singhapakdi - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):315-326.
    This paper, Study II, is the second in a series of papers investigating the relative importance of social responsibility criteria in determining organizational effectiveness, using student samples. A revised version of the Organizational Effectiveness Menu was used as a questionnaire with a sample of 182 senior undergraduate and the MBA students from three universities. Each respondent was asked to rate the importance of the criteria from a manager's perspective. The results support the earlier findings that students responding as managers rate (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Corporate social responsibility and organizational effectiveness: A multivariate approach. [REVIEW]Shaker A. Zahra & Michael S. LaTour - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):459 - 467.
    In this paper, three major themes in research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) are identified. Of particular interest, however, is the potential link between CSR and organizational effectiveness (OE). Data collected from 410 college graduate and undergraduate students were used to examine this relationship. Using factor analysis, eight dimensions of CSR and three components of OE were extracted. Canonical analysis was then performed. The result supports the proposition that specific CSR practices affect select OE outcomes. In addition, the method employed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. [REVIEW]Anusorn Singhapakdi, Scott J. Vitell, Kumar C. Rallapalli & Kenneth L. Kraft - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1131 - 1140.
    Marketers must first perceive ethics and social responsibility to be important before their behaviors are likely to become more ethical and reflect greater social responsibility. However, little research has been conducted concerning marketers' perceptions regarding the importance of ethics and social responsibility as components of business decisions. The purpose of this study is to develop a reliable and valid scale for measuring marketers' perceptions regarding the importance of ethics and social responsibility. The authors develop an instrument for the measurement of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   97 citations  
  • Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review.Marc Orlitzky & John D. Benjamin - 2001 - Business and Society 40 (4):369-396.
    Building on earlier work on the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and a firm’s financial performance, this integrative empirical study supports the theoretical argument that the higher a firm’s CSP the lower its financial risk. Specifically, the relationship between CSP and risk appears to be one of reciprocal causality, because prior CSP is negatively related to subsequent financial risk, and prior financial risk is negatively related to subsequent CSP. Additionally, CSP is more strongly correlated with measures of market risk (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  • Lifesizing in an era of downsizing: An ethical quandary. [REVIEW]Robert A. Miller - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1693-1700.
    Corporate executives, at the behest of Wall Street, have embraced the heresy of upsizing short-term shareholder profits by downsizing the long-term work force. This restructuring of corporate America, which views the corporation as an investment organization rather than a social organization, has created an ethical quandary by removing from the equation a sense of larger-purpose. This paper proposes a new paradigm, LIFESIZING, to address the issues raised by this ethical quandary. The paper will explore the effect the creation of fictitious (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The relative importance of social responsibility in determining organizational effectiveness: Student responses. [REVIEW]Kenneth L. Kraft - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3):315 - 326.
    This paper investigates the relative importance of social responsibility criteria in determining organizational effectiveness. The organizational effectiveness menu was used as a questionnaire with a sample of 151 senior undergraduates. Each respondent was asked to rate the importance of the criteria from three constituent perspectives within a service organization: (1) as a manager, (2) as an investor, (3) as an employee. Later, a subsample of students (n=61) responded to the same questionnaire acting as a manager in an assigned case study. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Determinants of earnings management ethics among accountants.Rafik Z. Elias - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):33 - 45.
    Earnings management behavior is a concern of standard-setters, regulators and the accounting profession. This study examines the ethics of this practice using a national sample of 763 accounting practitioners, faculty and students. Possible determinants of the ethics of this practice such as perceived role of ethics and social responsibility, and personal moral philosophies (i.e. idealism and relativism) are explored. Results indicate a positive relationship between social responsibility, focus on long-term gains, idealism, and the ethical perception of earnings management and negative (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Friedman’s Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility.Thomas Carson - 1993 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 12 (1):3-32.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Friedman’s Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility.Thomas Carson - 1993 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 12 (1):3-32.
  • Some determinants of student corporate social responsibility orientation.Brian K. Burton & W. Harvey Hegarty - 1999 - Business and Society 38 (2):188-205.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Yusuf J. Ugras - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1117-1127.
    Given the proliferation of research regarding the ethical development of students in general, and business students in particular, it is difficult to draw conclusions from the contradictory results of many studies. In this meta-analysis of empirical studies from 1985 through 1994, the relationships of gender, age and undergraduate major to the ethical attitudes and behavior of business students are analyzed. The results indicate that female students exhibit stronger ethical attitudes than males. The same is also true for older versus younger (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   139 citations  
  • The effectiveness of corporate ethics on-site visits for teaching business ethics.Gwen E. Jones & Richard N. Ottaway - 2001 - Teaching Business Ethics 5 (2):141-156.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Stakeholder-sensitive business ethics teaching.Johannes Brinkmann & Ronald R. Sims - 2001 - Teaching Business Ethics 5 (2):171-193.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • The Seven Deadly Sins of Corporate Doubletalk'.Larry D. Alexander - 1984 - Business and Society Review 48:41-45.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations