- Reflective Equilibrium in R & D Networks.Sjoerd D. Zwart & Ibo van de Poel - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (2):174-199.details
|
|
On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy: Commentary on: “Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology”.René Von Schomberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.details
|
|
Possibilities, Intentions and Threats: Dual Use in the Life Sciences Reconsidered.Koos van der Bruggen - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):741-756.details
|
|
Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.Simone van der Burg - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):97-110.details
|
|
How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology.Ibo van de Poel - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):25-38.details
|
|
Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. [REVIEW]Tsjalling Swierstra & Arie Rip - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):3-20.details
|
|
Ethics in Technological Culture: A Programmatic Proposal for a Pragmatist Approach.Tsjalling Swierstra, Michiel Korthals, Maartje Schermer & Jozef Keulartz - 2004 - Science, Technology and Human Values 29 (1):3-29.details
|
|
“Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.Andy Stirling - 2008 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (2):262-294.details
|
|
“Dual Use” and “Intentionality”: Seeking to Prevent the Manifestation of Deliberately Harmful Objectives.Raymond E. Spier - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):1-6.details
|
|
On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy.René Schomberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.details
|
|
Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium.R. P. B. Reuzel, G. J. Van der Wilt, Hamj ten Have & P. F. de Vries Robbe - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):245-261.details
|
|
Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium.R. P. B. Reuzel, G. J. van der Wilt, H. A. M. J. ten Have & P. F. Vries Robdeb - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):245 – 261.details
|
|
The authority of law: essays on law and morality.Joseph Raz - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Political liberalism: Reply to Habermas.John Rawls - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):132-180.details
|
|
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.details
|
|
Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.details
|
|
Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration into the Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA. [REVIEW]Debasmita Patra - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (2):143-157.details
|
|
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other? [REVIEW]Johane Patenaude, Georges Legault, Jean-Pierre Béland, Monelle Parent & Patrick Boissy - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (3):285-293.details
|
|
Dynamics of Change in Research Work: Constructing a New Research Area in a Research Group.Reijo Miettinen & Eveliina Saari - 2001 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 (3):300-321.details
|
|
Moral imagination, trading zones, and the role of the ethicist in nanotechnology.E. Gorman Michael, H. Werhane Patricia & Nathan Swami - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (3):185-195.details
|
|
What’s Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology?: Foundational Questions and Answers. [REVIEW]Robert E. McGinn - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):115-128.details
|
|
Ethical responsibilities of nanotechnology researchers: A short guide. [REVIEW]Robert McGinn - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):1-12.details
|
|
Kantian constructivism and reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in dialogue.Thomas McCarthy - 1994 - Ethics 105 (1):44-63.details
|
|
Risk management principles for nanotechnology.Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60.details
|
|
The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality.David Lyons & Joseph Raz - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (3):461.details
|
|
“Nanoethic”?: What's New?Paul Litton - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (1):22-25.details
|
|
Nanotechnology: From “Wow” to “Yuck”?Kristen Kulinowski - 2004 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 24 (1):13-20.details
|
|
Science, Ethics, and the âProblemsâ of Governing Nanotechnologies.Linda F. Hogle - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):749-758.details
|
|
Science, Ethics, and the “Problems” of Governing Nanotechnologies.Linda F. Hogle - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):749-758.details
|
|
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis F. Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Moral Imagination, Trading Zones, and the Role of the Ethicist in Nanotechnology.Michael E. Gorman, Patricia H. Werhane & Nathan Swami - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (3):185-195.details
|
|
But is it unique to nanotechnology?Marion Godman - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):391-403.details
|
|
Value-Laden Technocratic Management and Environmental Conflicts: The Case of the New York City Watershed Controversy.Leland L. Glenna - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (1):81-112.details
|
|
Developments in the debate on nanoethics: Traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. [REVIEW]Arianna Ferrari - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):27-52.details
|
|
What can Prudent Public Regulators Learn from the United Kingdom Government’s Nanotechnological Regulatory Activities?Bärbel R. Dorbeck-Jung - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (3):257-270.details
|
|
Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development.Neelke Doorn - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (3):180-209.details
|
|
A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks.Neelke Doorn - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):221-249.details
|
|
Applying Rawlsian Approaches to Resolve Ethical Issues: Inventory and Setting of a Research Agenda.Neelke Doorn - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):127-143.details
|
|
Norman Daniels: Justice and Justification. Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice & Folke Tersman, Reflective Equilibrium. An Essay in Moral Epistemology. [REVIEW]Theo van Willigenburg - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):129-132.details
|
|
“Knowledge Value Alliances”: An Alternative to the R&D Project Focus in Evaluation.Barry Bozeman & Juan D. Rogers - 2001 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 (1):23-55.details
|
|
On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics.Fritz Allhoff - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (3):185-210.details
|
|
The Democratic Paradox.Chantal Mouffe - 2000 - Verso.details
|
|
Democracy and disagreement.Amy Gutmann - 1996 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Edited by Dennis F. Thompson.details
|
|
Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies.Rene von Schomberg (ed.) - 2010 - Publications Office of the European Union.details
|
|
Delibration and democratic legitimacy.Joshua Cohen - 1989 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.details
|
|
Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice.Norman Daniels - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?Chantal Mouffe - 1999 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 66 (3):745-758.details
|
|
Ethics in a Technological Culture.J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer & T. Swierstra - unknowndetails
|
|
Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1996 - Ethics 108 (3):607-610.details
|
|