Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Origins of knowledge.Elizabeth S. Spelke, Karen Breinlinger, Janet Macomber & Kristen Jacobson - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (4):605-632.
    Experiments with young infants provide evidence for early-developing capacities to represent physical objects and to reason about object motion. Early physical reasoning accords with 2 constraints at the center of mature physical conceptions: continuity and solidity. It fails to accord with 2 constraints that may be peripheral to mature conceptions: gravity and inertia. These experiments suggest that cognition develops concurrently with perception and action and that development leads to the enrichment of conceptions around an unchanging core. The experiments challenge claims (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   174 citations  
  • Human infants’ understanding of social imitation: Inferences of affiliation from third party observations.Lindsey J. Powell & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2018 - Cognition 170 (C):31-48.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Six-month-old infants expect agents to minimize the cost of their actions.Shari Liu & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2017 - Cognition 160 (C):35-42.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age.György Gergely, Zoltán Nádasdy, Gergely Csibra & Szilvia Bíró - 1995 - Cognition 56 (2):165-193.
  • Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M. Leslie & Uta Frith - 1985 - Cognition 21 (1):37-46.
    We use a new model of metarepresentational development to predict a cognitive deficit which could explain a crucial component of the social impairment in childhood autism. One of the manifestations of a basic metarepresentational capacity is a ‘ theory of mind ’. We have reason to believe that autistic children lack such a ‘ theory ’. If this were so, then they would be unable to impute beliefs to others and to predict their behaviour. This hypothesis was tested using Wimmer (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   642 citations