Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters.Robert Sparrow - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):6-15.
    Despite the advent of CRISPR, safe and effective gene editing for human enhancement remains well beyond our current technological capabilities. For the discussion about enhancing human beings to be worth having, then, we must assume that gene-editing technology will improve rapidly. However, rapid progress in the development and application of any technology comes at a price: obsolescence. If the genetic enhancements we can provide children get better and better each year, then the enhancements granted to children born in any given (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • 'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue?A. Shapira - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (6):369-375.
    A "wrongful life" suit is based on the purported tortious liability of a genetic counsellor towards an infant with hereditary defects, with the latter asserting that he or she would not have been born at all if not for the counsellor's negligence. This negligence allegedly lies in the failure on the part of the defendant adequately to advice the parents or to conduct properly the relevant testing and thereby prevent the child's conception or birth. This paper will offer support for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • What is wrong with 'wrongful life' cases?Barry M. Loewer - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):127-146.
    torts raise a number of interesting and perplexing philosophical issues. In a suit for ‘wrongful life’, the plaintiff (usually an infant) brings an action (usually against a physician) claiming that some negligent action has caused the plaintiff's life, say by not informing the parents of the likely prospect that their child would be born with severe defects. The most perplexing feature of this is that the plaintiff is claiming that he would have been better off if he had never been (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • 'Wrongful life' claims.R. Gillon - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (6):363-364.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation