For all i ≥ 1, Ti+11 is not ∀Σb2-conservative over Ti1.

We investigate the possibility to characterize (multi) functions that are Σ b i -definable with small i (i = 1, 2, 3) in fragments of bounded arithmetic T 2 in terms of natural search problems defined over polynomial-time structures. We obtain the following results: (1) A reformulation of known characterizations of (multi)functions that are Σ b 1 - and Σ b 2 -definable in the theories S 1 2 and T 1 2 . (2) New characterizations of (multi)functions that are (...) Σ b 2 - and Σ b 3 -definable in the theory T 2 2 . (3) A new non-conservation result: the theory T 2 2 (α) is not ∀Σ b 1 (α)-conservative over the theory S 2 2 (α). To prove that the theory T 2 2 (α) is not ∀Σ b 1 (α)-conservative over the theory S 2 2 (α), we present two examples of a Σ b 1 (α)-principle separating the two theories: (a) the weak pigeonhole principle WPHP (a 2 , f, g) formalizing that no function f is a bijection between a 2 and a with the inverse g, (b) the iteration principle Iter (a, R, f) formalizing that no function f defined on a strict partial order ( $\{0,\dots,a\}$ , R) can have increasing iterates. (shrink)

We investigate the possibility to characterize (multi)functions that are-definable with smalli(i= 1, 2, 3) in fragments of bounded arithmeticT2in terms of natural search problems defined over polynomial-time structures. We obtain the following results:(1) A reformulation of known characterizations of (multi)functions that areand-definable in the theoriesand.(2) New characterizations of (multi)functions that areand-definable in the theory.(3) A new non-conservation result: the theoryis not-conservative over the theory.To prove that the theoryis not-conservative over the theory, we present two examples of a-principle separating the two (...) theories:(a) the weak pigeonhole principle WPHP(a2,f, g) formalizing that no functionfis a bijection betweena2andawith the inverseg,(b) the iteration principle Iter(a, R, f) formalizing that no functionfdefined on a strict partial order ({0,…, a},R) can have increasing iterates. (shrink)

Dynamic ordinal analysis is ordinal analysis for weak arithmetics like fragments of bounded arithmetic. In this paper we will define dynamic ordinals – they will be sets of number theoretic functions measuring the amount of sΠ b 1(X) order induction available in a theory. We will compare order induction to successor induction over weak theories. We will compute dynamic ordinals of the bounded arithmetic theories sΣ b n (X)−L m IND for m=n and m=n+1, n≥0. Different dynamic ordinals lead to (...) separation. In this way we will obtain several separation results between these relativized theories. We will generalize our results to further languages extending the language of bounded arithmetic. (shrink)