Эпистемологические механизмы исторического познания и исторической науки – предмет многолетних споров и дискуссий. Нередко эволюцию исторического знания возводят к культурам начальных обществ, к мифу, не акцентируя его отличий от других форм, в частности от научной историографии. Представленный в статье анализ разграничивает компетенции мемориальной практики, ориентированной на историческую память, и исторического познания, собственно истории как науки. Показывается, к каким недоразумениям ведет отсутствие понимания данного обстоятельства.

There is one critical way we honor great tragedies: by never forgetting. Collective remembrance is as old as human society itself, serving as an important source of social cohesion, yet as Jeffrey Andrew Barash shows in this book, it has served novel roles in a modern era otherwise characterized by discontinuity and dislocation. Drawing on recent theoretical explorations of collective memory, he elaborates an important new philosophical basis for it, one that unveils profound limitations to its scope in relation to (...) the historical past. Crucial to Barash’s analysis is a look at the radical transformations that symbolic configurations of collective memory have undergone with the rise of new technologies of mass communication. He provocatively demonstrates how such technologies’ capacity to simulate direct experience—especially via the image—actually makes more palpable collective memory’s limitations and the opacity of the historical past, which always lies beyond the reach of living memory. Thwarting skepticism, however, he eventually looks to literature—specifically writers such as Walter Scott, Marcel Proust, and W. G. Sebald—to uncover subtle nuances of temporality that might offer inconspicuous emblems of a past historical reality. (shrink)

La faculte de juger, qui dans l'ordre de nos facultes de connaitre, constitue un terme intermediaire entre l'entendement et la raison, possede-t-elle aussi, consideree en elle-meme, des principes a priori; ceux-ci sont-ils constitutifs ou simplement regulateurs (n'indiquant pas ainsi de domaine propre); donne-t-elle a priori une regle au sentiment de plaisir et de peine, en tant que moyen terme entre la faculte de connaitre et la faculte de desirer (tout de meme que l'entendement prescrit a priori des lois a la (...) premiere, mais la raison a la seconde): telles sont les questions dont s'occupe la presente Critique de la faculte de juger. Derniere grande oeuvre de Kant, la troisieme critique est aussi l'aboutissement de toute une vie vouee a la philosophie. (shrink)