Studia Philosophica Estonica 7 (2):5 (2014)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
I argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotle's Categories, to which the theory developed is applied
|
| Keywords | dependence, fundamentality, Aristotelian metaphysics |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.12697/spe.2014.7.2.02 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- spe.ut.ee
(no proxy) - spe.ut.ee [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Building and Surveying: Relative Fundamentality in Karen Bennett’s Making Things Up.Erica Shumener - 2019 - Analysis 79 (2):303-314.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-03-05
Total views
91 ( #127,987 of 2,504,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,306 of 2,504,809 )
2015-03-05
Total views
91 ( #127,987 of 2,504,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,306 of 2,504,809 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
