Interpretations of corruption in intercultural bargaining

International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 5 (3):196-213 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a fine line in business negotiations between being perceived as corrupt and having proper engagement with the natural tension and excitement of the business bargaining process. Combining literature review and experiential observation we provide a framework that will assist global business managers to more successfully negotiate cross-cultural business transactions. We identify some archetypal underpinnings of bargaining in a business context and question the established perceptions of corruption in intercultural business dealings. We conclude that different cultural systems produce variations of negotiating behaviour that need to be judged with a deeper local knowledge to avoid simply transferring inappropriate labels.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A cross-cultural comparison of attitudes towards business ethics.Michal Jirásek & Jakub Procházka - 2022 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
35 (#719,666)

6 months
11 (#332,310)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

From cultural adaptation to cross-cultural discursive competence.Yunxia Zhu - 2008 - Discourse and Communication 2 (2):185-204.
History, markets, hierarchies and institutions.Michael Haynes - 2009 - International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 3 (3):205.
Practicing the business of corporate social responsibility: a process perspective.Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117.

Add more references