Dissertatio 44:187-211 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
For Aristotle, demonstrative knowledge is the result of what he calls ‘intellectual
learning’, a process in which the knowledge of a conclusion depends on previous knowledge of
the premises. Since demonstrations are ultimately based on indemonstrable principles (the
knowledge of which is called ‘νοῦς’), Aristotle is often described as advancing a foundationalist
doctrine. Without disputing the nomenclature, I shall attempt to show that Aristotle’s
‘foundationalism’ should not be taken as a rationalist theory of epistemic justification, as if the first
principles of science could be known as such independently of their explanatory connections to
demonstrable propositions. I shall argue that knowing first principles as such involves knowing
them as explanatory of other scientific propositions. I shall then explain in which way noetic and demonstrative knowledge are in a sense interdependent cognitive states – even though νοῦς remains distinct from (and, in Aristotle’s words, more ‘accurate’ than) demonstrative knowledge.
|
Keywords | Aristotle Foundationalism science Demonstration Explanation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.15210/dissertatio.v44i0.9366 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle’s Definition of Scientific Knowledge.Lucas Angioni - 2016 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 19 (1):79-104.
View all 28 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Aristotle’s Contrast Between Episteme and Doxa in its Context (Posterior Analytics I.33).Lucas Angioni - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):157-210.
Kath’ Hauta Predicates and the ‘Commensurate Universals’.Owen Goldin - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):44-84.
Similar books and articles
The Foundations of Knowledge in Aristotle and Epicurus: A Comparative Analysis.Wesley C. Dempster - 2008 - Stance 1:20-25.
Knowledge and Justification of the First Principles.Miguel Garcia-Valdecasas - 2014 - In Niels Öffenberger & Alejandro Vigo (eds.), Iberoamerikanische Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik. Hildesheim, Germany: G. Olms.
Aristotle on Necessary Principles and on Explaining X Through X’s Essence.Lucas Angioni - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 7 (2):88-112.
Empirismo, conocimiento previo e inducción en Aristóteles, an. post. A 1.Fabián Mié - 2010 - Elenchos 31 (2):245-284.
Empirismo, conocimiento previo e inducción en Aristóteles, an. post. A 1.Fabián Mié - 2010 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 31 (2):243-284.
Demonstração, silogismo e causalidade.Lucas Angioni - 2014 - In Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles. pp. 61-120.
Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science.Michael Ferejohn - 1992 - Philosophical Review 103 (2):365-367.
Essence and Explanation in Aristotle's Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Nature.Richard John Tierney - 1996 - Dissertation, Columbia University
Aristotle on Explanation: Demonstrative Science and Scientific Inquiry.Kei Chiba - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Aristotle’s Definition of Scientific Knowledge.Lucas Angioni - 2016 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 19 (1):79-104.
Nous and Two Kinds of Epistêmê in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics.Zeev Perelmuter - 2010 - Phronesis 55 (3):228-254.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-04-07
Total views
378 ( #26,809 of 2,507,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #33,194 of 2,507,711 )
2017-04-07
Total views
378 ( #26,809 of 2,507,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #33,194 of 2,507,711 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads