What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?

Utilitas 33 (4):379-383 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Repugnant Conclusion served an important purpose in catalyzing and inspiring the pioneering stage of population ethics research. We believe, however, that the Repugnant Conclusion now receives too much focus. Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion should no longer be the central goal driving population ethics research, despite its importance to the fundamental accomplishments of the existing literature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-13

Downloads
1,617 (#8,198)

6 months
286 (#7,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christian Tarsney
University of Texas at Austin
Timothy Campbell
Rutgers - New Brunswick
18 more

References found in this work

Weighing lives.John Broome - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
In defence of repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
An impossibility theorem for welfarist axiologies.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):247-266.

View all 15 references / Add more references