Res Publica 18 (4):351-366 (2012)

Enrico Zoffoli
Technische Hochschule Darmstadt
In this paper I argue that Rawlsians have largely misunderstood the idea of an overlapping consensus of reasonable comprehensive doctrines, thereby failing to delineate in an appropriate way the place of comprehensive doctrines in political liberalism. My argument rests on two core claims. The first claim is that (i) political liberalism is committed to three theses about the overlapping consensus. The first thesis concerns the subject of the overlapping consensus; the second thesis concerns the function of the overlapping consensus; the third thesis explains how the overlapping consensus can serve its function in accordance with political liberalism’s commitment to epistemic neutrality. The second claim on which my argument relies is empirical: (ii) Rawlsians typically deny at least one of the three theses to which political liberalism is committed. Based on (i) and (ii), I conclude that Rawlsians have hitherto provided unconvincing accounts of the place of comprehensive doctrines in political liberalism
Keywords Comprehensive doctrines  Overlapping consensus  Political liberalism  Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-012-9197-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition.John Rawls - 2005 - Columbia University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Can My Religion Influence My Conception of Justice? Political Liberalism and the Role of Comprehensive Doctrines.Paul Billingham - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (4):402-424.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Realizing 'Political' Neutrality.Robert Westmoreland - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):541-573.
Overlapping Consensus: Objectivizing a Subjective Standpoint.Remi Odedoyin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:323-343.
Is a Political Conception of “Overlapping Consensus” an Adequate Basis for Global Justice?Karl-Otto Apel - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:1-15.
Environmental Values, Pluralism, and Stability.Ted Preston - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1-2):73 – 83.
Rawls on Pluralism and Stability.Robert B. Talisse - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):173-194.
Political Liberalism and Citizenship Education: Towards Curriculum Reform.John Halliday - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (1):43 - 55.
Political Egalitarianism.Joseph Heath - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):485-516.


Added to PP index

Total views
75 ( #152,339 of 2,499,269 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,670 of 2,499,269 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes