Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann (2018)

Authors
Alexandra Zinke
University Tübingen
Abstract
The book discusses the central notion of logic: the concept of logical consequence. It shows that the classical definition of consequence as truth preservation in all models must be restricted to all admissible models. The challenge for the philosophy of logic is therefore to supplement the definition with a criterion for admissible models. The problem of logical constants, so prominent in the current debate, constitutes but a special case of this much more general demarcation problem. The book explores the various dimensions of the problem of admissible models and argues that standard responses are unwarranted. As a result, it develops a new vision of logic, suggesting in particular that logic is deeply imbued with metaphysics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
Buy this book $47.50 used   $63.00 new   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 3465043456   9783465043454
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Accident of Logical Constants.Tristan Grøtvedt Haze - 2020 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):34-42.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence.Alexandra Zinke - 2013 - Dissertation, University of Konstanz
Ray on Tarski on Logical Consequence.William H. Hanson - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
Linear Temporal Logic with Until and Next, Logical Consecutions.V. Rybakov - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 155 (1):32-45.
Pluralism and Proofs.Greg Restall - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S2):279-291.
Logical Consequence and Natural Language.Michael Glanzberg - 2015 - In Colin Caret & Ole Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-120.
Models as Universes.Brice Halimi - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (1):47-78.
A Conception of Tarskian Logic.Gila Sher - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (4):341-368.
Logical Consequence: Its Nature, Structure, and Application.Colin R. Caret & Ole T. Hjortland - 2015 - In Colin R. Caret & Ole T. Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford University Press.
Reinflating Logical Consequence.Owen Griffiths - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (1):1-9.
The Formal-Structural View Of Logical Consequence.Gila Sher - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (2):241-261.
Logical Consecutions in Discrete Linear Temporal Logic.V. V. Rybakov - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1137 - 1149.
Models and Logical Consequence.Gil Sagi - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):943-964.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-17

Total views
30 ( #381,147 of 2,506,474 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,003 of 2,506,474 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes