I. Merricks vs. Hasker

In Ken Perszyk (ed.), Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford University Press. pp. 78 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman on Molinism.Trenton Merricks - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk (ed.), Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford University Press. pp. 90-95.
The Truth about Foreknowledge.Patrick Todd & John Martin Fischer - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (3):286-301.
On Hasker on Leftow on Hasker on Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):334-339.
On Merricks’s Dictum.Patrick Toner - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:293-297.
'Hasker'god, time, and knowledge'-response to Flint, Thomas.W. Hasker - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 60 (1-2):117-126.
The problem of natural evil II: Hybrid replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):560-574.
A Problem for Hasker.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Can 'downward causation' save free will?Justin A. Capes - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):131-142.
Response to Cross and Hasker.David B. Burrell - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):205-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dean Zimmerman
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Recent Work on Molinism.Ken Perszyk - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):755-770.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references