Ein Vergleich dreier aussagenlogischer Semantiken

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):44-61 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we compare three different semantic theories for a propositional language, namely a valuation-semantic, a truth-set- semantic and a modal-set-semantic theory. We prove step by step that these semantic theories are mutually equivalent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ein aussagenlogischer Aspekt der aristotelischen Syllogistik.Rainer Enskat - 1986 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (2):126-135.
Replies to Dreier and McNaughton.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2008 - Philosophical Books 49 (3):218-228.
Wozu Raum?: Systemtheorie, critical geopolitics und raumbezogene Semantiken.Marc Redepenning (ed.) - 2006 - Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde.
Boundless Good.James Dreier - forthcoming - Ms.
Books in Review.James Dreier - 1991 - Political Theory 19 (1):129-133.
Practical conditionals.James Dreier - 2009 - In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press. pp. 116--133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-25

Downloads
33 (#457,286)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Der Hauptsatz der Smullyanmengen.Alexander Zimmermann - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):24-43.

Add more citations

References found in this work

First-order logic.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1968 - New York [etc.]: Springer Verlag.
First-order Logic.William Craig - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):237-238.

Add more references